[00:00:53] METRO TV WILL GET STARTED. ONE MINUTE, PLEASE . GRAND. MM HMM. NO. HMM. [Call to Order] CALLED THE ORDER OF THE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE FOR TODAY. NOVEMBER 2ND. IT'S 435. THE CHAIR OF A BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE. RICK BLACKWELL WITH ME. TODAY OUR COMMITTEE MEMBERS, UM ON. VIRTUAL WE HAVE COUNCILMAN ARTHUR COUNCILWOMAN MCRANEY. AND [Roll Call] COUNCILWOMAN HAWKINS. UM AND THEN IN THE CHAMBERS WE HAVE COUNCILMAN I ONE COUNCIL MEN. HUDSON COUNCILMAN, P. ARGENTINA COUNCILMAN PARKER COUNCILWOMAN. FAOUR AND COUNCILWOMAN. ABOUT MISSING. YES NO, TWISTING MY HEAD HERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHO I'VE GOTTEN WHO I DO NOT HAVE. WHO I HAVE THAT ARE IN, UH COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND NOT. SO MISSING. UH. YES, COUNCILMAN PURVIS, BUT. BUT SHE'S NOT. YES WE HAVE COUNCILMAN PURPOSE IN COMMITTEE AS WELL. MISSING. VICE CHAIR. COUNCILMAN CRAMER AND COUNCILOR MULVIHILL. BECAUSE THEY WILL BE JOINING US. SOON. [00:05:02] I'M GOING TO TAKE THESE OUT OF ORDER BECAUSE WE HAVE A LOT OF GUESTS TODAY, SO I'M GOING TO ACTUALLY TO THE BOTTOM. OF OUR LIST HERE AND TAKE I DON'T 13 1ST, WHICH IS AN ORDINANCE [Pending Legislation] AMENDING ORDINANCE 182 SERIES. 2002 RELATING THE SIXTH ROUND OF AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN. OUR LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDING TO VARIOUS SLOW LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS TO ADDRESS THE CONTINUED IMPACT OF COVID 19 ON THE ECONOMY, PUBLIC HEALTH, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES BY REALLOCATING FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HEALTH CARE WORKFORCE INNOVATION COALITION PROJECT. TO VARIOUS LOCAL METRO DEPARTMENTS. MOTION MOTION. PROPERTY MOTION IN THE SECOND. AND. MISS DANA, YOU'RE WITH US TODAY THAT YOU'RE GOING TO START US. YOU'RE GOING TO LEAD US ON HERE. AND STEVE GOT A HOST OF FOLKS WITH YOU. BUT YOU'RE GOING TO START THIS. IT TAKES THE VILLAGE, MR. CHAIR GET A POINT OF ORDER BEFORE YOU GET STARTED. CERTAINLY SO I'M GONNA ASK. CAN I DECLARE MY ABSTENTION AND HAVE IT RECORDED EVEN AFTER I WALK OUT OF THE OFFICE BROKE OUT OF THE ROOM. OKAY SO I'M GONNA VOICE MY EXTENSION MY REASON FOR MY ABSTENTION FOR THIS RIGHT UP FRONT. OBVIOUSLY I'VE GOT A ONE OF THESE PROJECTS IS RELATED TO A COALITION EFFORT. ONE OF THE COALITION MEMBERS AS THE LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE CEO COUNCIL CURRENTLY HAVE A CONTRACT WITH THE LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE CEO COUNCIL. AH! AND SO I'LL BE ABSTAINING FROM THIS VOTE. FIRST. I WANT TO ASK IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS OF MY COLLEAGUES AS TO WHY I'M STANDING FROM THE VOTE. I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS THAT WAS PERFECT. THAT'S EXACTLY HOW IT SHOULD BE DONE. THANK YOU. GREAT. UM BUT JUST NOT TO MAKE IT ANY WEIRDER. I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND STEP OUT WORKING DOWNSTAIRS, AND WHEN WE RECONVENE ON THE OTHER ITEMS, I'LL COME BACK UPSTAIRS AND CONTINUE VOTING. MR CHAIR IF THAT'S OKAY, BUT MADAM CLERK, IT'S OKAY. I'M JUST PROACTIVELY ABSTAINING. SO IF IT COMES TO A VOTE, AND I'M NOT HERE, JUST PLEASE REGISTER ME SUBSTANTIALLY . THANK YOU. BUT I DO WANNA RECORDED THAT I'M STANDING I'LL BE. I'LL JUST COME BACK UP AND ACTUALLY CLICK THE ABSTAINED BUTTON. OKAY. THANK YOU. READY. LET IT ALL RIGHT. FOR THE RECORD. I'M DEPUTY MAYOR DINA MATAN. I'M OVER OPERATIONS AND BUDGET AND CAN HILLEBRAND WILL BE TAKEN OVER HERE IN A MINUTE. BUT AS YOU SEE A LOT OF MY COLLEAGUES THAT YOU KNOW, ARE ALSO HERE TO BE SURE THAT WE CAN ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU ALL HAVE THE ORDINANCE BEFORE YE WOULD REALLOCATE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN FUNDS IN THE MANNER THAT THE MAYOR OUTLINES ON OCTOBER 20TH. AND THAT PROPOSAL IS TO REALLOCATE MONEYS TO PARKS, LIBRARIES AND SUB GRANTEES OF THE ORIGINAL $40 MILLION ALLOCATION. WE GREATLY APPRECIATE OUR CO SPONSORS WHO WORKED WITH US REALLY QUICKLY TO GET THIS FILE. DOES YOU KNOW TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE AND GETTING THESE MONIES SPENT, AND WE NEED TO DEPLOY IT AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN TO SHOVEL READY AARP ELIGIBLE PROJECTS AND THESE ARE PROJECTS THAT WE KNOW ARE OF GREAT INTEREST TO YOU ALL AND TO OUR SHARED CONSTITUENTS. THAT'S PART OF WHY WE PICKED THE PROJECTS THAT WE DID, AND I THINK WE ALL AGREE. OUR GOAL IS NOT TO LEAVE ANY OF THIS MONEY ON THE TABLE. SO WE TRIED TO MOVE QUICKLY. YESTERDAY WE PROVIDED YOU ALL WITH A LIST OF SOME TALKING POINTS TO WALK YOU THROUGH ATTACHMENT A, WHICH IS THE REALLY THE MEAT OF THE ORDINANCE. BUT KEN IS GOING TO WALK US THROUGH THOSE. UM UNLESS THERE'S ANY PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS, MR CHAIRMAN, ALTERNATE OVER TO KEN AND THEN CAN OR I BEFORE WE WRAP UP TODAY WOULD BE HAPPY TO BRIEF YOU ON THE PROCESS THAT WE'RE USING TO WRAP UP THE EXISTING CONTRACTS BECAUSE I'M GUESSING YOU ALL MIGHT HAVE SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT. SO WITH THAT I WILL LET KEN TAKEOVER AND MY OTHER COLLEAGUES STAND READY TO HELP. KEN HILDEBRAND, DIRECTOR OF THE LOCAL ACCELERATOR TEAM, WHICH IS PART OF OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SO THE ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE AGENDA FOR TODAY THE FIRST ONE IS THE HEALTHCARE WORKFORCE INNOVATION COALITION IS BEING REDUCED FROM FOUR IS BEING CHANGED FROM $40 MILLION TO $1 MILLION. AND THAT $1 MILLION IS TO COVER WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN REIMBURSED AND ITEMS THAT WE EXPECT TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REIMBURSEMENT AS PART OF THE TERMINATION OF THE CONTRACT. THE OTHER ITEM IS THE NIGHT. SURE. CAN I ASK YOU THERE? SO SO? SO THESE ARE ONLY THINGS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ENCUMBERED. THANKS THAT SO THE ENTIRE 40 MILLION WAS ACTUALLY ENCUMBERED ALREADY. SO WHAT WE'RE DOING IS THESE ARE ITEMS THAT ONE HAVE ALREADY THEY'VE ALREADY BEEN. THEY'VE [00:10:04] ALREADY SPENT THE MONEY AND THEY'VE ALREADY REQUESTED REIMBURSEMENT. SO THAT'S THE 404,000. AND THEN THERE'S ANOTHER AMOUNT THAT WE'RE CONTINUING TO GET INFORMATION FROM THE CEO HEALTHCARE COUNCIL ON ITEMS THAT THEY HAVE FOR US TO REVIEW THERE'S SOME ITEMS ALREADY UNDER REVIEW, SO THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH THOSE NUMBERS RIGHT NOW. THE MILLION DOLLARS IS. HMM BUT THE ESTIMATE OF WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THAT TOTAL WILL BE OKAY. THAT'S CORRECT. THANK YOU. AND AS WE GO THROUGH THE PROCESS, YOU KNOW THAT NUMBER. THAT NUMBER COULD CHANGE IN EITHER DIRECTION. THE OTHER ITEM, AND AS DEPUTY MAYOR, MATAN SAID. THERE ARE OTHER DIRECTORS HERE FROM THE INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENTS TO ADDRESS THESE PARTICULAR ITEMS IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS SO IN THIS PARTICULAR SCHEDULE, A THE LIBRARY RENOVATION AND EXPANSION WAS SET UP FOR $5 MILLION, THE MAYOR'S PROPOSAL AND THE ORDINANCES TO ADD ANOTHER $10 MILLION TO THAT, SO THAT'S WHY YOU'LL SEE THAT 5 MILLION CROSSED OUT, AND THE NUMBER IS 15 MILLION, AND SO THAT'S FOR CONTINUATION OF THE PROJECTS. PORTLAND'S PARKLAND, FERN CREEK AND THE MAIN BRANCH OF THE LIBRARY. THE OTHER ITEM. THE NEW ITEMS ARE PARKS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECTS, AND THAT'S FOR 13,000,250. AND SO THAT'S TO COVER PROJECTS THAT ARE ON THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE LIST FOR THROUGHOUT THE THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY, LOUISVILLE IN THE COUNTY OF PROJECTS. YOU KNOW, THAT CAN HELP INCREASE SAFETY AT THE PARKS AND INCREASED USAGE OF THE PARK'S BELIEVE THAT LIST HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EVERYONE, I THINK, OKAY, THANK YOU. AND WE CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT. AND PARKS DIRECTOR AND ASSISTANT DIRECTOR HERE TO ANSWER SPECIFIC QUESTIONS. THE OTHER ITEM IS THE RUSSELL STATION TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING CENTER. SO THIS IS WHERE WE TALK ABOUT THE SUB RECIPIENTS THAT ARE REMAINING AFTER THE CEO C COMPONENT IS REMOVED. WE WANTED WE ARE PROPOSING TO CONTINUE WITH THE RUSSELL STATION TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING CENTER, SO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CENTER AND THEN ALSO OTHER OTHER SUB RECIPIENTS SUCH AS METRO UNITED WAY ELDER SERVE LOCAL URBAN LEAGUE. AND UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE, WHO CAN WHO ARE PROVIDING SUPPORT FOR THAT PROJECT, SO THEY ALREADY HAD THEY ALREADY HAD SUB AGREEMENTS. ALL OF THOSE FOLKS DID WITH THE HEALTHCARE CEO COUNCIL. WE'VE ASKED THEM FOR NEW PROPOSALS WITHOUT THE CEO C COMPONENT, AND WE'RE EXPECTING TO GET THOSE THAT FIRST DRAFT OF THOSE TOMORROW FROM EACH OF THOSE SUB RECIPIENTS. SO. AGAIN YOURS. IT'S. YOU'RE KIND OF TRYING TO ANTICIPATE AS BEST YOU CAN. WHAT THOSE COSTS WILL BE. THAT'S CORRECT. ME. OBVIOUSLY YOU START WITH WHAT THE SUB GRANTEE WAS GETTING BEFORE PEACE TOGETHER SOME THINGS THAT MAYBE ARE ADDITIONAL REQUESTS THAT WILL HAVE OF THEM BECAUSE THANK YOU. WE TOOK YOUR ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. WE TOOK THE NUMBERS, SO THERE WERE SUB RECIPIENT AGREEMENTS THAT CEO HEALTHCARE COUNCIL HAD WITH THOSE ORGANIZATIONS OR WE'RE GETTING READY TO THERE WAS ONE ORGANIZATION. THEY DIDN'T QUITE HAVE A CONTRACT YET WITH, BUT THEY HAD ALREADY PUT OUT AN RFP AND THEY WERE WORKING ON THAT AGREEMENT. SO WE LOOKED AT THOSE AGREEMENTS THAT WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET AHOLD OF, UM AND I THINK WE HAVE MOST OF THEM RIGHT NOW MORE COMFORTABLE. AND WE SAID, HERE'S WHAT THOSE THOSE AMOUNT TO AND THAT'S HOW WE CAME UP WITH THE 15,750,000. AND SO WE'VE ASKED THEM TO SUBMIT A NEW PROPOSAL TO US SO THAT WE CAN REVIEW IT AND SCALE IT WITH WITHOUT THE CEO C COMPONENT GOING FORWARD. COUNCILMAN ARTHUR . PLEASE I'M WONDERING IF FOR L A T 0100 FOR THE LIBRARY RENOVATIONS AND EXPANSIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE DETAILS THAT EXPLAINED HOW THAT MONEY IS DISTRIBUTED BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT LIBRARY BRANCHES. SO I'LL GET I'LL START THIS OFF. AND THEN LEE IS HERE. ALSO UM THE AMOUNTS WERE FULL PARKLAND, PORTLAND'S FERN CREEK AND LIBRARY. THERE WAS A SPECIFIC AMOUNT ALREADY ALLOCATED TO EACH OF THOSE LIBRARIES. AND IN THE LAST ORDINANCE REGARDING LIBRARY , THE COUNCIL APPROPRIATED $5 MILLION TO BE ALLOCATED AS THE LIBRARY NEEDED THEM FOR THOSE PROJECTS OF THE PRIORITIES WERE PARKLAND, PORTLAND AND FERN CREEK AND THIS ADDITIONAL $10 MILLION WOULD BE USED IN THAT SAME MANNER. THAT'S THE EXTENT OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND I LEAVE IF HE IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING, YOU NEED MORE DETAILED. WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THAT. IF POSSIBLE. I WOULD JUST LOVE TO [00:15:06] HEAR MORE ABOUT IT, AND I'LL ASK THE SAME QUESTION. AS FAR AS PARKS GO, WE DID GET A DRAFT. OF THAT DEFERRED MAINTENANCE REGARDING PARKS AND THEN RANKED BUT WE DIDN'T GET ONE FOR LIBRARIES. AT LEAST I DIDN'T SEE ONE FOR LIBRARIES. I'M JUST CURIOUS IF THERE'S ANY MORE DETAIL THAT WE CAN KNOW BEFORE WE APPROVE THE FUNDING. SURE THANK YOU. LEE BURCHFIELD, DIRECTOR OF THE LOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY, SO WE'VE GOTTEN FUNDING FOR THESE FOUR CAPITAL PROJECTS FROM A VARIETY OF SOURCES THAT INCLUDE CAPITAL FUNDING FROM LOUISVILLE, METRO, A STATE CONSTRUCTION GRANT AND THEN TWO DIFFERENT ROUNDS OF ART FUNDING. AND AS KEN SAID, UH, THE FIRST ROUND OF ART FUNDING ACTUALLY SPECIFIED. AN AMOUNT OF THE DOLLARS IN THAT ROUND OF FUNDING THAT WERE DESIGNATED FOR EACH OF THESE PROJECTS. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT AROUND 800,000 WAS FOR THE PARKLAND LIBRARY 800,000 FOR THE PORTLAND'S LIBRARY AND 5 MILLION WAS FOR THE FERN CREEK LIBRARY. THERE WAS A CAPITAL FUND EXPENDITURE. FROM FISCAL YEAR OR ALLOCATION FROM FISCAL YEAR 22 THAT DESIGNATED 500,000 FOR THE PARKLAND LIBRARY, 2 MILLION FOR PORTLAND AND $1,040,000 FOR THE FIRM CREEK LIBRARY. I IF I THINK KEN HAS A COPY OF THIS SPREADSHEET IF YOU ALL HAVEN'T GOTTEN A COPY OF IT WE CAN CERTAINLY GET THAT TO YOU. SO THERE ARE SOME FUNDS THAT HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED FOR A SPECIFIC PROJECT. AND THEN THERE IS AN ALLOCATION OF 5 MILLION THAT HAS NOT BEEN SPECIFIED FOR ANY PROJECT IN PARTICULAR. IN ADDITION, THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION HAS MADE A COMMITMENT TO RAISE $5 MILLION OF PRIVATE FUNDING. AND THAT FUNDING UNLESS THEY DONOR PUTS A RESTRICTION ON A GIFT TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION. THAT FUNDING IS NOT SPECIFICALLY ALLOCATED TO ANY PARTICULAR PROJECT. SO WHAT WE ARE PLANNING TO DO IS ALLOCATE THAT UNALLOCATED FUNDING TO WHICHEVER THOSE PROJECTS IT'S NEEDED FOR IN ORDER TO HAVE THE FULL ESTIMATED COST ON HAND FOR EACH OF THE PROJECTS. THANK YOU FOR THE RECAP. SO JUST TO BE CLEAR. WE DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH OF THE REALIGNMENT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO IMPROVE NOW WOULD GO TOWARDS EACH OF THOSE LIBRARIES. WE'RE JUST GIVING YOU THE LARGE LUMP SUM. INSANE. PUT THE MONEY WHERE IT NEEDS TO GO THAT JUST TO BE CLEAR, RIGHT? THAT IS CORRECT ON THE PROPOSAL BEFORE THE COUNCIL OR THE COMMITTEE THIS EVENING, AND THAT IS ALSO TRUE OF THAT. 1ST $5 MILLION FROM ROUND SIX OF ART FUNDING. I JUST WANTED TO BE CLEAR ON THAT. AND THANK YOU SO MUCH AND SAME QUESTION WOULD APPLY FOR PARKS, BUT WE DID GET A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION ABOUT PARKS. COULD SOMEBODY TALK TO US ABOUT HOW THAT LIST REFLECTS THE NEEDS THAT WERE OUTLINED IN PARKS FOR ALL. GOOD EVENING. UM SO, COUNCILMAN TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. UM THE PARKS FOR ALL STUDY DOESN'T NECESSARILY IDENTIFY PARTICULAR LOCATIONS OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE NEEDS OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT STATES THAT WE NEED A WHOLE LOT OF MONEY FOR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE. WHAT WE DID WITH THE LIST THAT THAT YOU'VE GOT THAT SPREADSHEET, EVERYTHING IN TOTAL ON THAT SPREADSHEET ABOUT $20 MILLION WHAT'S HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW IS THE 10 $10 MILLION. EXCUSE ME. YOU NEED STATE YOUR NAME. FOR THE RECORD. I APOLOGIZE. NO PROBLEM. ANNUAL ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF THE LOUISVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION THANK YOU. SORRY ABOUT THAT. SO LIKE I WAS SAYING THAT THE GRAND TOTAL OF EVERYTHING ON THAT SPREADSHEETS ABOUT 20 MILLION THE HIGHLIGHTED IS KIND OF WHAT WE HAD RECOMMENDED. UM ON WHAT WE BELIEVE THE GREATEST NEEDS ARE AND THOSE BASIC NEEDS ARE LIFE SAFETY ISSUES. UM SO THAT THAT'S KIND OF HOW WE ARRIVED AT THE CONCLUSION OF WHAT WAS RECOMMENDED. AND WE'RE OPEN TO SUGGESTIONS IF OTHER PROJECTS THAT ARE ON THE LIST YOU ALL FEEL OR MORE. HIGHER PRIORITY THAN OTHERS WERE OBVIOUSLY OPEN TO OTHER SUGGESTIONS AND IDEAS. AND I REALLY JUST BRING IT UP BECAUSE PARK FOR ALL DID HAVE SPECIFIC LOCATIONS AS FAR AS PRIORITY AND IT HAD A NUMBER OF FACTORS. SO I JUST WANT TO BE CAREFUL THAT WE'RE NOT JUST BASING IT ON WHAT YOU ALL BELIEVE IS THE NEED VERSUS WHAT IS THE NEED FROM A REALLY SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY TO COME TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THOSE PRIORITIES ARE. I STILL DON'T REALLY FEEL COMFORTABLE KNOWING WHAT THEY NEED IS BASED ON PARKS FOR ALL TO YOUR LIST, [00:20:01] BUT MAYBE I COULD BE CONVINCED IF WE IF WE JUST KIND OF SIT DOWN AND WORK THROUGH IT, BUT I AM CURIOUS HOW YOU CAME TO THAT DECISION BECAUSE IT'S A LITTLE UNCLEAR. WELL THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE LIST IS THAT ONGOING LIVING DOCUMENT THAT WE UPDATE WEEKLY ABOUT EVERY WEEK EVERY TWO WEEKS. SO THAT THAT'S THE LIST THAT WE'VE PROVIDED. THOSE ARE THE ACTUAL NEEDS. THE TOP PRIORITY SITES THAT ARE LISTED IN THE PARKS FOR ALL STUDY WHAT WE HAD RECOMMENDED, UM WE INCLUDED 35TH STREET PARK, BALLARD PARK AND SLEVIN. THOSE ARE ALL TOP PRIORITY SITES. UM THERE WERE FOUR SECOND PRIORITY SITES AUBURNDALE, CENTRAL HOUSTON, QUINN IN SOUTH CENTRAL AND THERE WERE TWO OF THE THIRD PRIORITY SITES OF KLONDIKE AND SHELBY. SO WE WERE TRYING TO UH UM. HIT AS MUCH AS WE CAN WITH WHAT WE'VE GOT, SO WE TRIED TO SPREAD IT AROUND. UM BASED ON WHAT THE PARTS FOR ALL STUDY. UM SAID THE NEEDS ARE AS WELL AS WHAT WE SEE AS FAR AS THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE NEEDS AND LIFE SAFETY ISSUES. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. I JUST HAVE 11 LAST QUESTION. IT SHOULD BE PRETTY EASY BECAUSE I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE THOSE PROPOSALS AS FAR AS THAT HEALTHCARE COALITION IN THE SUB GRANTEES. YOU CAN TALK TO US ABOUT HOW DIFFERENT THOSE PROPOSALS ARE OR HOW DIFFERENT THEY MIGHT BE COMPARED TO WHAT THEY WERE DOING WITH THE HEALTHCARE CEO COUNCIL. YES I CAN ADDRESS THAT. WHAT WE'RE WHAT WE'VE ASKED. EACH OF THEM TO DO IS TO MAKE A SUBMISSION TO US. FOR WHAT THEY WERE GOING TO DO WITH THE CEO COUNCIL. BUT WITHOUT THE COMPONENT FROM THE CEO, SO IF SOMEONE WAS GOING TO PROVIDE BARRIER REMOVAL SERVICES , AND THAT'S B A R R E R SOMEONE THOUGHT I WAS SAYING BURIAL, SO IT'S BARRIER BARRIER REMOVAL SERVICES, FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT COACHING, SO WE WANT THEM TO GIVE US A PROPOSAL FOR THAT. THAT'S A LINE TO WHAT RUSSELL OR AMPED IS GOING TO BE DOING THROUGH THE RUSSELL STATION TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING CENTER. SO IT WOULDN'T BE FOR YOU KNOW EVERYTHING THAT CEO SEE COUNCIL WAS HAVING THEM DO BUT IT WOULD BE ALIGNED AND SCOPED TO FIT IN WITH WHAT THE RUSSELL TRAINING AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER WILL BE DOING. THANK YOU. I'LL GET BACK AT ME. COUNCIL IN HUDSON. THANK YOU CHAIR. UM MY QUESTION IS FOR PARKS. SORRY. BRING YOU BACK UP, JASON. UM. AND TO COUNCILMAN ARTHURS POINT. I APPRECIATE YOU APPRECIATE WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT BOUNCING. THE LIST THAT YOU MAINTAIN OFF OF THE PARKS FOR ALL I THINK IF YOU TOOK A HEAT MAP OF THE PARKS FOR ALL PROJECTS AND A HEAT MAP OF THE, UM, PROJECTS THAT YOU HAVE LISTED HERE AND OVERLAY THEM. I THINK YOU'D BE THIS ABOUT THE SAME. OF THIS $12 MILLION THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED FROM YOUR LIST. ALL BUT ABOUT A MILLION OF IT IS WITHIN THE IMMIGRANT SERVICES DISTRICT. SO I THINK THOSE TWO WOULD WOULD MATCH VERY CLOSELY. MY QUESTION IS IF YOU LOOK AT THE HIGHLIGHTED LIST IT COMES UP TO INCLUDING THE POOLS. UM JUST NORTH OF 12 MILLION CORRECT, BUT WHAT WAS ALLOCATED IN THE ART? IS 13 MILLION. IS THE IDEA FOR US OR THE MAYOR'S OFFICE OR SOMEONE TO PICK FROM THE NON HIGHLIGHTED LINE ITEMS TO MAKE UP THAT EXTRA MILLION OR WHAT. I HONESTLY I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE INTENT IS, BUT YOUR MATHEMATICS IS CORRECT. UM I THINK THE TOTAL WAS 13.25 MILLION. AND WHAT WE'RE SHOWING IS RIGHT AROUND 12, SO I'M NOT SURE MRS BEETON. THIS IS KEN HILLEBRAND AGAIN. I CAN HERE'S WHAT I THINK WE SHOULD LOOK AT IS, I THINK WE COULD ADD SOME OTHER PROJECTS TO THAT. BUT ALSO I THINK WE NEED TO BE PREPARED FOR INFLATION ON ON SOME OF THE ESTIMATES, I DON'T AND I CAN ASK JASON OR YOU KNOW, THIS IS SOMETHING WE'RE RUNNING INTO WITH A LOT OF CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROJECTS AS INFLATION LOGISTICS. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I WAS TALKING TO JASON ABOUT THIS BEFORE IS I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ABLE TO HELP HIM GET THESE PROJECTS GOING REALLY QUICKLY SO THAT WE MEET THE TIMELINE OF DECEMBER 31ST 2024 TO HAVE ALL THIS MONEY OBLIGATED. TO CONTRACTORS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS TO DO THAT WORK. SO I THINK WE COULD ADD MORE PROJECTS TO GET IT UP TO THE 13 TO 50. BUT WE JUST NEED TO BE AWARE OF WITH INFLATION. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO GET TO ALL OF THOSE, BUT I THINK WE CAN ADD MORE PROJECTS TO IT, AND I CAN APPRECIATE THAT. AND I GUESS THERE'S JUST A DIFFERENCE OF PERSPECTIVE ON WHICH APPROACH WOULD BE BEST. PERSONALLY, I THINK. YOU LIST OUT ALL THE PROJECTS AND IF THIS INFLATION HAPPENS, YOU DECIDE WHAT TO CUT INSTEAD OF LEAVE [00:25:04] SOME MONEY ON THE TABLE. AND IF INFLATION HAPPENS, THEN IT JUST EATS IT OFF THE TABLE. IT IT'S SIX AND ONE AFTER ANOTHER. I GUESS DIFFERENCE IN PERSPECTIVE BECAUSE THAT'S BECAUSE I WAS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE QUESTIONS. I WAS ASKING, YOU WERE THE EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE SIDE, MAKING SURE THAT WE HAD ENOUGH THERE THAT IF THOSE MGM. IF THE CONTRACTS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT COME BACK AND ARE ASKING FOR, YOU KNOW, ASSUMING THAT THE BARRIERS THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT THOSE ARE GOING TO BE IDENTIFIED OVER HERE, AND NOW YOU'RE ASKING HIM TO IDENTIFY THEM ON THEIR OWN. AND THEY'RE GONNA THEN OBVIOUSLY, THAT COST IS GOING TO BE MORE THAN SO THAT WAS MY LINE OF QUESTIONING WAS DO WE HAVE ENOUGH MONEY IN THEIR ORIENTED HATING THOSE KINDS OF THINGS SO THAT'S THE OTHER SIDE OF IT, BECAUSE ADMITTEDLY WHEN WE HAVE PUT THIS TOGETHER QUICKLY THAT THEY'RE NOT THE LIST OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE. MY GOSH, WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THAT FOR SINCE I GOT ON A COUNCIL FEELS LIKE SO NOT ALL THAT QUICKLY. BUT IN TERMS OF THE ONES THAT YOU'RE PULLING TOGETHER FOR, UH, NOT THE WHOLE PROJECT IS IT'S PULLED TOGETHER QUICKLY WITH GREAT NECESSITY. OF COURSE, YES. ALSO WANT TO ADMIT COUNCILMAN CRAMER HAS JOINED US IN PRESIDENT WENDLER WHO JOINED US ACTUALLY, QUITE A LONG TIME AGO. SO PODCAST FROM ME TAKING SO LONG. DO YOU HAVE A FOLLOW UP? NOT SO MUCH A FOLLOW UP, BUT JUST YEAH. I DON'T KNOW WHICH METHODOLOGY IS BEST NOT TO KNOW IF THERE IS THE BEST ONE. UM, BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO APPLY THAT METHODOLOGY TO PARKS MAYBE WE NEED TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE OTHER TWO CATEGORIES OF THE RUSSELL IN THE LIBRARIES. AND MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T HAVE AND OVERRUN ON THOSE AS WELL. BUT YEAH, I THINK I'M AGNOSTIC TO WHAT DIRECTION WE'RE GOING IN. I THINK THAT'S CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG HERE, I THINK THAT IS WHAT YOU JUST TESTIFIED TO FOR THAT YOU HAVE THAT. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE HAVE WITH LIBRARIES AND WITH THE OTHERS IS A LITTLE BIT OF LEEWAY THERE IN CASE THOSE SCHEMES, THINGS COME BACK. YEAH, I THINK THAT IS CONSISTENT. THANK YOU. COUNCILOR NO. ONE THANK YOU. CHAIR CAN I GET SOME CLARIFICATION ON WHAT ARE WE BEING ASKED TO CONSIDER THIS AND PASS THIS OUT OF COMMITTEE AT THIS MEETING. IS THAT WHAT WE'RE ARE WE REVIEWING FOR A FUTURE VOTE? I WOULD THINK WE'RE ASKING FOR YOU TO CONTINUE WORKING ON THIS AND HOPEFULLY HAVE A VOTE NEXT WEEK ON IT AT THE FULL COUNCIL. YOU MAY NOT PASS IT OUT OF COMMITTEE TONIGHT, BUT IF THAT'S POSSIBLE, THAT WOULD BE ONE STEP CLOSER. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS THE TIGHT TIMELINE THAT WE HAVE FOR SOME OF THESE PROJECTS TO GET THINGS OBLIGATED AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN. WE HAVE SOME AGREEMENTS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT AND TRYING TO PUT TOGETHER AND EXECUTE THOSE AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN TO GET THOSE SIGNS SO THAT THOSE SUB RECIPIENTS UNDER THE HEALTH CARE COMPONENT THAT'S REMAINING OR WORKFORCE COMPONENT THAT'S REMAINING SO THAT THEY CAN GET STARTED QUICKLY ARE ARE THERE OTHER TIMELINES OTHER THAN THE DECEMBER 2024 TIMELINE THAT YOU MENTIONED BEFORE? THERE ARE OTHER TIMELINES? THERE'S TWO TIMELINES THAT WE'RE WORKING ON. AND THAT IS THE FIRST ONE IS DECEMBER 31ST 2024. ALL THE FUNDS HAVE TO BE OBLIGATED, AND THAT MEANS PRETTY MUCH WE HAVE TO HAVE ALL THE FUNDS INCOME BIRD OR DEDICATED TO PARTICULAR SERVICE AND CONTRACTS ARE HAVE BEEN RELEASED FOR THOSE BY DECEMBER. 31ST 2026 ALL THE FUNDS HAVE TO BE SPENT. SO I'LL JUST GIVE AN EXAMPLE. IF JASON HAS A LARGE PROJECT AND HE GETS ALL THE FUNDS AND COME BIRD BY DECEMBER, 31ST 2024. BUT THE FUNDS ARE EXPENDED ALL BY DECEMBER. 31ST 2026 WE WON'T BE ABLE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. ANY FUNDS THAT AREN'T EXPENDED NEED TO BE RETURNED TO THE U. S. TREASURY. SO I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND THE TIME OF IS OF THE ESSENCE. AND ALL OF THAT. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS A LOT OF MONEY, AND THERE ARE A LOT OF MOVING PARTS. UM AND SO FOR ME, I WOULD LOVE TO BE ABLE TO, YOU KNOW, SAY, LET'S YOU HEAR BACK FROM THE SUBCONTRACTORS THAT YOU'RE WAITING TO HEAR AND SEE WHAT THAT DOES LOOK LIKE EXACTLY SO WE CAN GET A BETTER FEEL FOR THIS. I MEAN, WE I DON'T WANT TO TALK TOO MUCH ABOUT WHERE THIS STARTED, BUT WE ALLOCATED THIS MONEY ONCE ALREADY, AND I HAVE NOW PULLED IT BACK FOR ALL SORTS OF REASONS. BUT THERE PERHAPS WEREN'T AS MANY QUESTIONS ASKED ON THE FIRST TIME AROUND, IS THERE NEEDED TO BE AND I DON'T WANT TO MAKE THAT MISTAKE AGAIN. THAT'S THE ONLY REASON I'M ASKING THE QUESTIONS. SO HERE'S WHAT I EXPECT FOR THE TIMELINE FOR WORKING WITH THE SUB RECIPIENTS THAT WERE ASKING FOR PROPOSALS TO GET THOSE DOERS. TOMORROW WE'LL GET THOSE THEY'LL GIVE US A FIRST DRAFT WILL START GOING THROUGH THEM AND START WORKING WITH THEM ON WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE, UM, THERE MAY BE THINGS THAT WE ASKED THEM TO [00:30:01] REMOVE FROM THE PROPOSAL. THERE MAY BE THINGS THAT THEY NEED TO ADD. MAYBE THEY DIDN'T THINK ABOUT SO I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE A COUPLE OF WEEKS FOR THAT PROCESS TO BE COMPLETED. UM AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS CAN DECIDE HOW YOU WANT TO VOTE ON THAT, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF WE WANT IF WE CAN REALLY AFFORD TO WAIT. 3 TO 4 WEEKS FOR ALL OF THIS TO PASS BECAUSE I THINK PART OF IT. THEY'RE ALSO LOOKING AT WHAT THE COUNCIL IS GOING TO DECIDE ON AS FAR AS THE COUNCIL GOING TO APPROVE THIS SO THAT WE CAN GO AHEAD AND MOVE FORWARD TO GIVE HIM SOME CONFIDENCE THAT AS WE'RE NEGOTIATING WITH THEM, AND TO EXECUTE THOSE SEVERAL WARD AGREEMENTS THAT OR ON GOOD STANDING WITH HIM TO DO THAT. FAIR ENOUGH. I APPRECIATE YOU SHEDDING SOME MORE LIGHT ON THAT . I HAD A QUICK CALL FROM ONE OF MY KIDS. AND SO I GOT DISTRACTED FOR A MINUTE THERE. SO IF YOU'VE ALREADY GONE OVER THIS, I APOLOGIZE, BUT, UM, I UNDERSTOOD . ORIGINALLY THE HEALTHCARE COC WAS KIND OF AN UMBRELLA GROUP THAT WAS FUNDING. THE SUBCOMMITTEE'S IS THE RUSSELL GROUP SERVING IN A SIMILAR CAPACITY OR NOT. YES THERE IS A SUBURB. WE HAD AN AGREEMENT WITH CEO HEALTHCARE COUNCIL AND THERE WERE THREE SEPARATE AGREEMENTS AND ONE OF THE AGREEMENTS WAS WITH CEO HEALTHCARE COUNCIL AND THAT WAS FOR THE RUSSELL STATION AND SO ONE OF THEIR SUB RECIPIENTS WAS RUSSELL STATION. OKAY SO AS THAT AS THOSE AGREEMENTS WERE TERMINATED, WE'VE REACHED OUT TO AMPED, WHICH WAS DOING THE RUSSELL STATION PROJECT AND ASKED THEM WE'RE FAMILIAR WITH THEIR PROPOSAL. WE'VE ASKED THEM TO RESUBMIT IT WITH AGAIN. BUDGET WORK PLAN PROJECT PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORM SO THAT WE CAN EVALUATE IT WITHOUT THE CEO C COMPONENT AND COME UP WITH WHAT THAT NEW SUB RECIPIENT AGREEMENT IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE THAT OF EACH OF THE THREE ORGANIZATIONS. THERE'S FOUR THAT WE'VE ASKED THAT OF ANY OF THOSE ORGANIZATIONS BE SERVING AS AN UMBRELLA FOR ANY OF THE OTHER THREE, OR WILL IT BE MORE DIRECT FUNDING THIS TIME AS OPPOSED TO GOING THROUGH ONE? CHAMP THAT'S A POSSIBILITY. I THINK AS WE GET THOSE BACK WE'RE GOING TO LOOK TO SEE IS THERE ONE ORGANIZATION THAT CAN SERVE AS THE UMBRELLA FOR THAT? OR IS THAT A ROLE THAT WE'RE GOING TO PLAY AND DOES THERE NEED TO BE AN UMBRELLA? OR CAN IT BE MORE EFFICIENT IF IT'S DIRECT FUNDING TO THE THREE ORGANIZATIONS? I THINK WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AT IT. YEAH AS SEPARATE COMPONENTS AND DETERMINE WHICH ONES HAVE THE CAPABILITIES TO DO IT, MAYBE ON THEIR OWN AND WHICH ONES HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO SERVE AS THE UMBRELLA BECAUSE THAT'S ONE THING WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, UM WE DON'T WANT TO PUT SOMEONE IN A IN A IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY'RE NOT REALLY ABLE TO MANAGE ALL THOSE PROJECTS OR PUT THEM IN A SITUATION WHERE MAYBE THEY DO NEED IT. SOMEONE MANAGER MANAGING IT FOR, UM SO I THINK WE'RE GONNA WANT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANKS. VERY WHEN MULVIHILL HAS JOINED US COUNCILWOMAN HAWKINS. OKAY, I'M ON HERE. CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES YOU HEAR ME? UM I JUST HAD A COUPLE OF THEM. QUESTIONS AND THEN I'M JUST GONNA SPEAK TO A COUPLE OF CONCERNS THAT I HAVE , UM I DEFINITELY AGREE WITH MY COLLEAGUE ANDREW ONE. IT'S A LOT OF MOVING PARTS. BUT WITH THIS I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. UH, 1 MILLION IN THE HEALTH CARE. WHAT DOES THAT OUR COVER? THEN I KNOW THEY SAID 1 MILLION LEFT. THAT'S THE FIRST ONE AND THEN THE 5 MILLION FOR THE LIBRARY THAT WILL JUST BE LEFT. I GUESS TO PUT IT WHEREVER I WANT TO KNOW, LIKE WERE THOSE FUNDS WHERE THOSE FUNDS FOR ME AND THEN WHATEVER EXTRA MONEY WOULD BE LEFT IN PART, BECAUSE WHAT I'M BEGINNING TO, UM. WHEN I'M BEGINNING TO SEE, UM, IS A LOT OF AND UNDERSTAND THAT. LUMBER GOES UP AS FAR AS THE ON THE DEVELOPER STANDPOINT, BUT IN A LOT OF THESE DEPARTMENTS AND STUFF, A LOT OF MOVING PARTS, I'M BEING ABLE TO HEAR QUITE FREQUENTLY NOW. WELL THE COST OF THIS HAS HAD AND I GET THAT, BUT CAN WE BE A LITTLE BIT MORE PRECISE? UH ITEM AS IN SPECIFIC I THINK THAT THIS IS VERY PREMATURE. IT IS AND IT'S ALREADY ENOUGH GOING ON, AND IT'S ALREADY MESSY. SO IT'S RIGHT HERE IS LIKE I JUST GOT ON BUDGET, NOT BECAUSE I KNEW THAT THIS WAS GOING ON, BUT JUST TO GET ON. AH! I THINK IT'S REALLY QUICK. HONESTLY UM, BUT I DEFINITELY WANT TO KNOW THE 1 MILLION IN THE HEALTHCARE. UM WHAT? WHAT DOES THAT COVER AND THE 1 MILLION LEFT FOR THE LIBRARY? UM AND YEAH, I HAVE A LIBRARY IN THE DISTRICT. I DEFINITELY WANT, UM, MY LIBRARY TAKEN CARE OF BUT. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE SEC SECOND GO [00:35:08] AROUND. UM NOW THAT I AM ON COUNCIL THAT. WE GOT THINGS THAT YOU KNOW YOU WANNA EVERYTHING. DO YOU HEAR ME? YES. YES YES. SO YOU WANTED TO ADDRESS THE YEAH. NOT YOUR POLICY FOR A SECOND, A LOT OF ADDRESS IT. AND THEN YOU CAN DO FOLLOW UP QUESTION. YEAH. SO COUNCILWOMAN HAWKINS, THE FIRST ITEM THE MILLION DOLLARS FOR THE HEALTHCARE WORKFORCE INNOVATION COALITION. THAT MILLION DOLLARS IS GOING TO BE USED TO PAY FOR ITEMS TO COVER THOSE ITEMS THAT WE'VE ALREADY REIMBURSED THEM FOR. SO THAT'S ABOUT $404,000, AND THEN WE'RE GETTING ITEMS FROM THEM. WHEN WE TERMINATED THE CONTRACT, WE SAID , WE NEED TO START SENDING US EVERYTHING THAT YOU'RE HOLDING ONTO, OR THERE'S THINGS THAT WE ALREADY HAD IN THE QUEUE FOR REVIEW, SO THAT'S WHAT THAT MILLION DOLLARS. WE EXPECT THAT TO BE ABLE TO COVER THAT THOSE ITEMS. SO WE'RE. AND DID YOU SAY THAT YOU WERE WAITING ON THE WHAT WOULD YOU SAY HE WAS WAITING ON THE COMEBACK IN WAITING FOR FROM THE HEALTHCARE CEO COUNCIL AND WE SENT THEM THE TERMINATION NOTICE. WE ALSO SAID START. DON'T HOLD ON TO ANYTHING. START SENDING IT TO US BECAUSE WE NEED TO KNOW WHAT WE'RE CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED TO PAY TO PAY THEM SO THEY'RE STARTING TO SEND THAT TO US. THEY NOW HAVE A DEADLINE OF WHEN WE NEED TO HAVE ALL THAT INFORMATION SO THAT WE CAN PROVIDE A FULL ACCOUNTING FOR WHAT HAS BEEN SPENT. THERE ARE THINGS THAT WE THAT HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF ALREADY BEING IN CONTRACT WITH HIM TO DO THAT, CORRECT. THAT'S CORRECT THE THINGS THAT THEY'VE ALREADY DONE. OKAY AND THEN THE 5 MILLION FOR THE LIBRARIES OF THE MILLION DOLLARS FOR THE LIBRARY. SO THAT $5 MILLION IS ACTUALLY WAS BUDGETED LAST YEAR FOR THE LIBRARY AND WHAT THIS AMENDMENT IS DOING IS ADDING ANOTHER $10 MILLION TO THAT, SO IT'S FOR A TOTAL OF ADDITIONAL 50 ADDITIONAL $10 MILLION FOR THE LIBRARY. BUT IN THIS SCHEDULE A IT'S A TOTAL OF $15 MILLION. SO THAT'S TO COVER THE EXISTING LIBRARY PROJECTS. UH PORTLAND PARKLAND, FERN CREEK AND THE MAIN BRANCH. AND THAT THAT'S TO COVER WHATEVER FUNDS THEY NEED TO COMPLETE THOSE PROJECTS. AND I HAVE LEE BIRCHFIELD IS HERE AND HE CAN ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. UH, ABOUT THE LIBRARY FUNDING. OKAY SO IT'LL BE AN EXTRA, UM SEEING MILLION FOR LIBRARIES JUST FOR IN AND OUT. EXTRA 10 MILLION, BASICALLY THAT WHAT YOU SAID WOULD BE LEFT IN THERE FOR POOL TO DO. WHAT SURE, THANK THANK YOU. SO LEE BURCHFIELD, UH, LOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY DIRECTOR, SO WE CURRENTLY HAVE FOUR. I WAS IN THE WEEDS MY FIRST TIME UP HERE, SO I'M GOING TO PULL BACK NOW TO A MUCH HIGHER OVERVIEW. WE HAVE FOUR ACTIVE CAPITAL PROJECTS GOING ON RIGHT NOW. ONE IS THE PARKLAND LIBRARY THAT WE'RE REOPENING. ONE IS THE EXPANSION OF THE PORTLAND'S LIBRARY. ONE IS THE BUILDING OF A NEW FIRM CREEK LIBRARY, AND ONE IS SOME EXTENSIVE RENOVATIONS AT MAIN. THE TOTAL COST THE CURRENT ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF THOSE FOUR PROJECTS IS $44.3 MILLION. WHEN YOU ADD THEM ALL TOGETHER AND WE CURRENTLY HAVE COMMITTED IN HAND $24.6 MILLION OF FUNDING FOR THAT. IN ADDITION TO THAT, 24.6, WHICH IS MADE UP OF METRO CAPITAL FUNDS, A STATE CONSTRUCTION GRANT AND FEDERAL ART FUNDS FROM PREVIOUS ROUNDS. IN ADDITION TO THAT THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION IS COMMITTED TO RAISING $5 MILLION OF PRIVATE FUNDS, WHICH WOULD PUT US AT 29.6 MILLION TOWARDS THIS TOTAL. PROJECT COST OF $44.3 MILLION, SO THIS 10 MILLION WOULD GO INTO THAT SAME POOL OF MONEY TO HELP PAY FOR THOSE FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS AND WILL BE DISTRIBUTED BASED ON WHERE WE HAVE FUNDS THAT ARE ALREADY SPECIFICALLY DEDICATED AND WHERE WE HAVE ADDITIONAL FUNDING NEEDS BASED ON THE COST, AND THE LAST THING I WANT TO SAY IS THAT FOR THE FIRST TWO PROJECTS, PARKLAND AND PORTLAND'S WE ARE AT THE POINT NOW WHERE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR HAS ACTUALLY BEEN OUT ELEMENTS OF THAT WORK, SO WE HAVE BIDS BACK FROM SUBCONTRACTORS, SO WE HAVE PRETTY FIRM UNDERSTANDING ON THOSE TWO PROJECTS OF WHAT THE COST IS GOING TO BE. WE'RE CURRENTLY ESTIMATING THE COSTS FOR FERN CREEK AND MAIN BASED ON WHAT WE'VE SEEN AS BOTH MATERIALS AND LABOR COSTS FROM THOSE FIRST TWO PROJECTS THAT ARE FURTHER ALONG. OKAY, UM AND LASTLY, UM JASON. FOR OKAY, SO [00:40:12] THE ITEM AS, UM. IT WAS THE LIST THAT YOU SENT OVER. AND THE WAS WAS THE COWS DOWN. THE OTHER SIDE WAS HOW DID YOU DETERMINE THAT LIST? THE COSTS THAT THAT WE HAVE ON THAT LIST OR ESTIMATES AND RIGHT NOW. YOU KNOW THE WAY THE MARKET IS MATERIALS AND LABOR. I THINK WHAT WE'VE ESTIMATED IS AS CLOSE AS WE CAN GET BASED ON. UH PREVIOUS PROJECTS THAT WE'VE RECENTLY BIT OUT. SO AGAIN, THAT'S OUR OUR BEST. UH, BEST IDEA. BASED ON OUR RECENT EXPERIENCE. OKAY UM, SO DID YOU GET WITH THEM? AND? AND DOES THAT YEAH. DID YOU GET WITH EACH COUNCIL PERSON? I'M SORRY. WHAT WAS THE QUESTION? DID YOU DID? YOU KNOW? DID YOU COMMUNICATE WITH EACH COUNCIL PERSON? UM BECAUSE IT'S PERTAINING TO EACH DISTRICT MONEY GOING TO PARKS. RIGHT SO DID YOU GET WITH EACH COUNCIL PERSON TO SEE WHAT THEY FELT LIKE THE NEEDS WAS, OR WAS IT JUST SOMETHING THAT YOU THOUGHT WAS A I'M BIGGER NEED THAN OR HOW DID THAT GO? BECAUSE I DIDN'T KNOW. I JUST SEEM TO LIST RIGHT, SO YEAH, WE DID NOT REACH OUT TO EVERY COUNCIL MEMBER. WE LIKE I WAS EXPLAINING BEFORE THAT ARE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE LIST AS A LIVING DOCUMENT. THAT PROJECTS COME ON AND GO OFF AS THEY GET DONE WHAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED ON THAT SPREADSHEET OR OR WHAT WE WOULD CONSIDER MORE LIFE SAFETY ISSUES WHICH ARE VERY HIGH PRIORITY HIGH NEED FOR US TO GET DONE. UM SO AGAIN. THAT'S WE DID NOT REACH OUT TO EACH COUNCIL MEMBER FOR THOSE PROJECTS. NO COUNCIL COUNCILYOU KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO GET BACK IN THE QUEUE HER WE HAVA LO OF PEOPLE ON HERE, COUNSELOR AND PARKER. YES, THANK GHT HAVE JUST TAKEN THEIROU DEFERRED MAINTENANCE IS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE. SO AND UM, THIS IS A LOT OF DOLLARS. LITTLE BIT CONCERNED THAT IT'S ALL BEING SPENT. IN THE URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT. AND YOU DID SAY THAT YOU WOULD BE OPEN TO SUGGESTIONS SO UH UM. I KNOW THERE'S SOME THINGS THAT WERE THE LIST THAT WE THOUGHT WERE GOING TO BE DONE, AND THEY'RE NOT. THEY DIDN'T EVEN MAKE THE LIST. UM SO IF WE EMAILED YOUR OFFICE, WOULD YOU BE OPEN TO SUGGESTIONS TO PUT TINY AMOUNTS OF DOLLARS AND DEFERRED MAINTENANCE. FOR SOME OTHER THINGS SO WE CAN GET IT BACK ON YOUR RADAR. SEE IT'S. IF THERE'S A POSSIBILITY. FOR SOME OTHER DEFERRED MAINTENANCE NEEDS TO BE DONE OPEN OPEN TO VERY CONCENTRATED IN JUSTICE, A FEW AREAS. UM AND THEN THE REST OF EVERY DISTRICTS ARE LEFT OUT. RIGHT WELL, JUST JUST SO YOU KNOW, AND SO THERE'S OUT OF THE 26TH DISTRICTS. THERE'S TWO WITH NO PARKS. UM. ON THIS LIST. ONLY EIGHT DISTRICTS DID NOT HAVE A PROJECT ON THE LIST. SO THAT MEANS 16 TOTAL DISTRICTS OUT OF 26 HAVE SOMETHING ON THE LIST. THESE SO YOU KNOW, TRYING TO HIT EVERY DISTRICT. UM AS WELL AS TRY TO BE OUR NEEDS ON WHAT WE THINK IS NEEDED MOST. IT'S A DAUNTING TASK. UM OR IS IT PERFECT? PROBABLY NOT SO AGAIN. OPEN TO SUGGESTIONS. SURE BUT I THINK A COUNSELOR BLACKWELL PROCEDURALLY. I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU WANT TO APPROVE THIS OUT OF COMMITTEE. UM BE IT YOUR APPROVING THE ACTUAL LIST AS PART OF THE ORDINANCE OR IS IT OPEN TO PROJECTS COMING ON AND OFF OF THE LIST. I GUESS THAT THAT'S PROCEDURALLY. I THINK THAT'S UP TO YOU ALL. YEAH, I THINK WE WOULD BE. I THINK WE WOULD BE PASSING THE LIST, AS IS BECAUSE OTHERWISE WE THEN. OTHERWISE THERE WOULDN'T BE A LIST AT ALL. BUT MAKE THIS IS KEN HILDEBRAND AGAIN. JUST ONE SUGGESTION THAT YOU MIGHT WANT TO CONSIDER IF YOU WANTED TO. IF THIS IS PROCEDURALLY AS KIND OF PASS IT, BUT THEN DISCUSSED THE LIST AND FINALIZE THE LIST FOR NEXT WEEK. AND THE NEW LIST. YOU KNOW THAT COMES UP TO THE FULL AMOUNT FOR THE PARKS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT. THAT'S YOUR MEETING NEXT WEEK. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S APPROPRIATE IN YOUR [00:45:02] CAUCUSES OR SOME OTHER SOME OTHER MEANS. YEAH. OKAY. THAT'S. I'M NOT SURE I'M GONNA GO THAT WAY. BUT THAT'S A THAT'S A SUGGESTION. YES CAN I ADD ONE THING TO THAT? UM JUST CAUTION. IF YOU DO THAT, THAT TAKES AWAY THAT WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK ANYTIME. SOMETHING ON THE LIST CHANGED IF A SHELTER COLLAPSES AND ALL OF A SUDDEN WE NEED TO DEAL WITH THAT, AND THAT'S MORE IMPORTANT TO MOVE TO THE TOP OF THE LIST. WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK AND GET APPROVAL FROM YOU ALL TO DO THAT SO YOU KNOW IF YOU ARE OPEN TO OUR OPENNESS ABOUT SHARING THE LIST AND TALKING ABOUT WHAT'S ON THE LIST AND POSSIBLY ADDING THINGS TO THE LIST, I THINK WE'RE CERTAINLY OPEN TO THAT. I WOULD JUST COSTING YOU IF YOU MAKE IT PART OF THE ORDINANCE THAT THAT SORT OF FREEZES IT AT A POINT IN TIME, AND I THINK YOU JUST HEARD JASON SAY IT CHANGES WEEKLY. I THINK, UM JUST TWO. PART OF WHAT WE HAVE DONE IN THE PAST, AND WHAT WE DID IN THE LAST BUDGET PROCESS WAS TO SAY WHEN WE WERE UM WHEN WE HAD APPROPRIATED FUNDS, AND THEN WE ALSO LIKE FOR EXAMPLE, THE ELABORATING GREAT EXAMPLE. WHEN WE PUT THE FUNDS IN FOR THE LIBRARY AND THE BUDGET AND THE CURRENT BUDGET. UM WE REALIZED THAT IT WASN'T THAT IS NOT FULLY FUNDED. BUT WE ALSO REALIZE YOU CAN'T SPEND IT ALL IN THIS ONE YEAR. AND SO WE HAD WE HAD LISTED AS A PRIORITY FOR ANY ART FUNDS THAT COME BACK . THE LIBRARY'S BEING ONE OF THE PLACES THAT WE WANTED TO SPEND THE MONEY PARKS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE BEING ANOTHER PLACE THAT THEY WANT TO. SO I THINK WHAT YOU BROUGHT OVER TO US IS EXACTLY WHAT WE ASK YOU TO DO IN THE BUDGET WAS TO SAY IF THERE'S MONEY COMING BACK NO ONE ANTICIPATED IT WAS GOING TO COME BACK IN THIS MANNER. BUT IF THERE'S MONEY COMING BACK FROM WHATEVER THAT WE WOULD THEN RE APPROPRIATED IN IN THOSE WAYS, SO I THINK YOU'RE BEING VERY CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE ASKED YOU TO DO IN THE PAST, AND WE CAN, AND WE CAN ADD, YOU KNOW TO MY COLLEAGUES. IF WE SAY OKAY, WELL, IN ADDITION TO THOSE THINGS THAT YOU KNOW, BACK TO COUNSELING, HUDSON'S POINT IN ADDITION TO THOSE THINGS THAT WE HAVE LISTED TO THERE, IF THERE ARE FUNDS LEFT OVER HERE, THE THINGS THAT WE THINK SHOULD BE THE NEXT ROUND. WE HAVE DONE THAT. WE HAVE THAT CURRENTLY IN OUR BUDGET RIGHT NOW WHERE WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK. YOU KNOW IF THERE'S FUNDS THAT COME AVAILABLE. WE HAVE TWO OR THREE PROJECTS THAT WE HAD AGREED AT BUDGET TIME. NO WE ALSO WE AGREE THAT BUDGET SO SOMETIMES WHEN YOU COME BACK TO, LIKE, REMEMBER THAT AGREEMENT, BUT, UM, BUT THAT'S THE REASON THAT WE TAKE THESE MEETINGS. SO WE HAVE PLENTY OF WE CAN GO BACK. THANK YOU. COUNCILOR, ONE COUNCILWOMAN FOWLER. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. SO I'VE GOT SEVERAL QUESTIONS. UM FIRST. THE BRUSSELS PROJECT. NONE OF THE LAND MILLION DOLLARS THAT WE ALLOCATED A YEAR AGO HAS BEEN ENCUMBERED. ALL THE MONEY WAS ALL THE MONEY FOR ALL OF THE AGREEMENTS WAS ENCUMBERED. HOW MUCH HAS BEEN SPENT IT WAS WITH CEO HEALTHCARE FOR THAT PROJECT. I DON'T HAVE THE AMOUNT IN FRONT OF ME, BUT THEY HAVE SUBMITTED REIMBURSEMENTS TO THE CEO HEALTHCARE PROJECT, BUT THEY HAVE ALSO HAVE NOT COME TO US YET. SO I DON'T HAVE THAT EXACT NUMBER IN FRONT OF ME. MOST OF THOSE EXPENSES WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR UH UM. GETTING CONTRACTORS LINED UP. THEY'VE MADE SOME AWARDS FOR SOME PROJECTS FOR SOME OF THE WORK ALREADY, BUT THEY HAVEN'T STARTED CONSTRUCTION YET. HAVE THEY BOUGHT THE PROPERTY? THEY HAVE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY. YES. OKAY AND THAT'S BEEN SO THAT MONEY HAS BEEN SPENT THAT MONEY PART OF THE FOUR MY UNDERSTANDING FOR THEIR PROPOSAL THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SEND US TOMORROW IS NOT GOING TO INCLUDE THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY. SO WHERE IS THAT GOING TO COME FROM? THEY'RE GOING TO SEEK OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS FOR THAT. THE AMT IS. BUT DOESN'T THAT HOW THE PROJECT SOMEWHAT WELL, THEY'VE ALREADY PURCHASED THE PROPERTY THEY CAMPED HAS OKAY ALREADY PURCHASED THE PROPERTY. OKAY SO THEY WERE SEEKING REIMBURSEMENT FROM CEO HEALTHCARE COUNCIL. FOR THAT AND THEN CEO HEALTHCARE. A COUNCIL WAS GOING TO SUBMIT IT TO US. OKAY THE NEW AGREEMENT, THEY WOULD SUBMIT THAT TO US, BUT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO INCLUDE THAT IN THEIR PROPOSAL TO US ANY LONGER. THEY'RE GOING TO SEEK ANOTHER SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY. OKAY AND THEN FOR THE FAMILY IN DOLLARS NON SPECIFIED MONEY FOR LIBRARIES. THAT WAS ALLOCATED A [00:50:05] YEAR AGO AS WELL. YES, THAT'S HAS THAT BEEN ENCUMBERED. YES. THERE, UM I HAVE TO LOOK AT MY NOTES. I DON'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME RIGHT NOW, IF THAT'S BEEN ENCUMBERED I DON'T THINK IT HAS BEEN. AND WHY WOULD THAT BE? AFTER A YEAR THERE WAITING? I THINK THEY'RE WAITING TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACTS AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO USE ALL THE MONEY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECTS. SO THEY HAVE OTHER GRANTS THAT THEY'RE USING OF FOR THE I GUESS. FOR THE CONSULTANTS . YEAH SO, SO LEE BURCHFIELD, LIBRARY DIRECTOR. WE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE DESIGN PHASE ON THE FERN CREEK AND MAIN LIBRARIES AND ARE PAYING FOR THAT WITH MONEY THAT WE HAD ON HAND. WE HAVE STARTED THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE AT PARKLAND. IT'S VERY EXCITING OVER THERE RIGHT NOW. UM AND SO WE WILL START ENCUMBERING AND SPENDING THAT MONEY NOW THAT CONSTRUCTION HAS STARTED, BUT THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN LOW ENOUGH. WHILE WE'VE BEEN IN THE DESIGN PHASE THAT WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO THAT THAT $5 MILLION ALLOCATION OF ART FUNDS. THERE WERE OTHER FUNDS THAT WERE ALLOCATED TOWARDS THOSE PROJECTS. PRIOR TO THAT, THAT $5 MILLION IN OUR BROWN SIX. IT WAS SOME SOME JUST CAPITAL MONEY FROM TWO DIFFERENT BUDGETS FROM 19 AND 22. THERE WAS ALSO A CAPITAL EXPENDITURE. AND OR ALLOCATION IN FY 20 THREE'S BUDGET, AND THEN WE ALSO HAD A STATE CONSTRUCTION GRANT FOR THE PORTLAND'S LIBRARY, SO WE HAD FUNDS FROM OTHER SOURCES THAT WERE AHEAD OF THOSE 5 MILLION WERE, WE WILL SPEND IT. ALTHOUGH OKAY? UM AND THEN I NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL. SO FOR AMPED FOR METRO UNITED WAY FOR URBAN LEAGUE AND I NEED TO UNDERSTAND WHY YOU HAVE TO HELP THIS AND UFL IS NOT YOUR HEALTH, AS OPPOSED TO U OF L. ALL THE GRANTS THAT WE HAVE WITH UFL OR THROUGH THE UFL RESEARCH FOUNDATION. SO I'M NOT SURE WHY YOU HAVE. L DOES IT THAT WAY. BUT WE HAVE ACTUALLY, WE HAVE SEVEN OR EIGHT THROUGH UFL HEALTH. EXCUSE ME. YOU HAVE L RESEARCH FOUNDATION AND THEN WE HAVE ONE THROUGH THE UFL REAL ESTATE UFL REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION. SO THAT'S THAT'S HOW YOU HAVE. L EXECUTES THE CONTRACTS WITH US. SO WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO? WELL, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT YOU HAVE HELPED DIDN'T EVEN HAVE A SEAT AT ON THE C E. O. C. OKAY SO I DON'T KNOW THAT, BUT THANK YOU. I DO. OKAY, UM SO I WAS JUST CONFUSED AS TO WHY. SAY WHAT WAS THE QUESTION WAS CONFUSED AS TO WHY THAT WAS THE CASE. WHY YOU AVAIL HEALTH. IS NOT INVOLVED IN THIS. UNDERSTAND THAT THAT MAYBE THE GRANT YOU KNOW? I DON'T I DON'T HAVE A NEW IS AS SUCH THAT IT NEEDS TO BE THAT WAY. UM OKAY. AND THEN, UM. THERE WAS ONE MORE AND I DON'T SEE IT. I'LL GET BACK IN THE QUEUE. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU, PRESIDENT WINKLER. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. I JUST HAVE ONE COMMENT, AND ONE QUESTION. UH SO THE FIRST QUESTION CAN FOR YOU. UM IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING FROM THE PRESS CONFERENCE COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO THAT THE BASICALLY THE RP GRANT CONSISTED OF FOR GRANT AGREEMENTS. YOU TERMINATED ONE YOU DID NOT TERMINATE THE OTHER THREE. IS THAT CORRECT? WE HAD THERE WERE THREE AGREEMENTS WITH CEO HEALTHCARE. GROUP THERE WERE THREE AGREEMENTS AT ALL THREE HAVE BEEN TERMINATED. OKAY OKAY, SO THESE ARE THAT'S THAT WAS THE ROOM MY QUESTION BECAUSE I THOUGHT YOU'D MAINTAIN THOSE AGREEMENTS AND I WASN'T SURE WHY THEY WERE ON THE LIST. YOUR INSTEAD ESSENTIALLY REPLACING WHAT WAS WITH NEW DIRECT GRANT AGREEMENTS WITH THESE SUB SUB RECIPIENTS ESSENTIALLY, IS WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY, UM THE ONE COMMENT I WOULD MAKE ABOUT THE CONVERSATIONS RELATIVE TO THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE. YOU KNOW, I AGREE WITH WITH COUNSELING, ARTHUR. I MEAN, I WOULD JUST POINT OUT TO EVERYBODY THAT LAST YEAR WE PASSED THE PARKS FOR ALL PLAYING UNANIMOUSLY, AND THAT PLAN CALLED FOR A SERIES OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE INVESTMENTS . I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT YOU KNOW, WE PROVIDE SOME LEVEL OF FLEXIBILITY TO THE FOLKS WHO ARE ON THE FRONT LINES THAT ARE, YOU KNOW, SORT OF IN THE DAY TO DAY OR ADDRESSING THE NEEDS AND THE PARKS AND, UM, YOU KNOW, MAKE SURE WE'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF FLEXIBILITY THERE. THAT IF JASON SEES THAT THIS STRUCTURE IS FALLING DOWN, OR, YOU KNOW, THESE BLEACHERS NEED TO BE REPLACED OR WHATEVER IT IS, AND IT'S ALIGNED, UH, TO THE PRIORITIES THAT WERE SET OUT IN THE PARK FOR ALL PLAN. THAT THEN THAT'S WHAT WE SHOULD FOLLOW. IF WE WANT TO GO THROUGH, YOU KNOW EVERY TIME AND SEE HOW WE CAN JOCKEY FOR MONEY AND IN SPECIFIC AREAS THAT WE REALLY DIDN'T NEED THE PARK'S ROLE PLAYING, UM, YOU [00:55:04] KNOW, AND SO YOU KNOW, I WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE US TO FOLLOW. THAT PLAN IS SORT OF THE GUIDING THE GUIDE POST. FOR HOW WE ALLOCATE PARKS MONEY. YOU KNOW, WE PUT A TON OF MONEY INTO THE FOUR YEAR BUDGET, UM FOR PARKS SPECIFICALLY FOR ADDITIONAL UPGRADES OF THE SPREAD, YOU KNOW, ACROSS AND TO ME. THIS IS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE MONEY THAT THAT SHOULD BE ALLOCATED, YOU KNOW, BASED ON WHERE THE NEED IS, UM AND HOPE WE CAN. WE CAN SUPPORT THAT. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. THANK YOU, COUNCILOR KRAMER. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. I DON'T WANT TO SOUND LIKE A BROKEN RECORD. I THINK I'M GONNA SAY SOME OF THE THINGS THINGS SOME OF THE SAME THING, AS MY COLLEAGUES HAVE SAID, UM, I WAS GONNA ASK JASON, UM, IF THERE IS A REASON TO ALTER THE SENSE OF URGENCY FOR SOME OF THESE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PLANTS, AND SO IF YOU IF YOU WANT TO COME FORWARD, YOU CAN IF YOU CAN JUST NOT FROM WHERE YOU ARE. I THINK I HAVE IT RIGHT. I JUST WANT TO SAY IT OUT LOUD AND MAKE SURE I DO. UM WHAT WE ARE RECOGNIZING IN THE PARKS DEPARTMENT IS THAT WE HAVE THIS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PLAN INCLUDED IN THE PARK FOR ALL PROJECT. AND THAT'S IMPORTANT TO US. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, WE ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT WE HAVE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE ISSUES THAT ARE MORE URGENT. THEN THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE THAT'S LISTED IN THAT PARKS FOR ALL PLAN. AND SO IT'S NOT A QUESTION OF SAYING WE LIKE THIS PARKER. WE DON'T LIKE THAT PARK. IT'S A QUESTION OF SAYING I'VE GOT DEFERRED MAINTENANCE MONEY IDENTIFIED THESE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN CARE OF, AND SOME OF THEM HONESTLY HAVE BEEN ON THE LIST FOR A LONG TIME. SO THEY'VE BEEN NEEDED TO BE TAKEN CARE OF. BUT NOW I'VE GOT THIS OTHER ITEM AND THAT'S ANOTHER PARK. THAT'S NOT NECESSARY ON THAT LIST. BUT THIS ITEM IS HIGHLY URGENT. BECAUSE IF I HEARD YOU, RIGHT, YOU'RE LOOKING AT SOME, UM LIFE AND SAFETY ISSUES. SO I MEAN, IF I GET THE PARTS FOR ALL PLAN, UNDERSTAND? LOOK, I VOTED ON IT TO YOU. BUT. IF I'M GOING TO BE IF I WANT TO LOOK AT THIS ASSEMBLY LOCKSTEP. I'M LOCKED INTO THIS PLAN BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT WE SAID. AND I'M GONNA HAVE A LIFE SAFETY ISSUE IN ANOTHER PARK. AND I'M GOING TO IGNORE THAT BECAUSE I MADE COMMITMENT TO DEFERRED MAINTENANCE. I THINK THAT'S A MISTAKE. I MEAN, I'M I'M COMMITTED TO DEFERRED MAINTENANCE. HEAVEN KNOWS ANYBODY WATCHING COMMUNITIES. MEETINGS KNOWS THAT'S YOU KNOW, THAT'S MY FAVORITE DRUM TO BANG ON. UM BUT I THINK YOU DO THE ONES THAT ARE LIFE. SIFT LIFE SAFETY THAT JUST MAKES THE MOST SENSE TO ME. UM, THAT'S SAD. I UNDERSTAND THE ADMINISTRATION'S POINT THAT YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO HAVE COMPLETE FLEXIBILITY TO THE CHAIR'S POINT. THE REASON WE HAVE THE LIST IS SO WE KNOW THAT DEFERRED MAINTENANCE IS ACTUALLY BEING TAKEN CARE OF, AND WE KNOW SOME OF THE STUFF'S BEEN ON THE LIST FOREVER. WE DON'T WANT TO JUST KEEP WAITING, SO I DON'T KNOW HOW TO WE CAN'T I WON'T SAY CAN'T I AM NOT WILLING TO GIVE CARTE BLANC. FLEXIBILITY ON DEFERRED MAINTENANCE AND SAY HERE'S $13 MILLION FIX WHAT YOU THINK NEEDS TO BE FIXED, RIGHT? BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I'M ALSO NOT WILLING TO SAY HERE'S A LIST WITH 13.2 MILLION AND IF YOU HAVE A LIFE SERVING A LIFE ISSUE SOMEWHERE ELSE, YOU CAN'T FIX THAT FIRST, AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ANSWER IS. I DON'T KNOW IF I'M GONNA MAKE AN AMENDMENT HERE IN A MINUTE TO YOU KNOW, PUT 10 MILLION TO ONE AND 3 MILLION ON THE OTHER SIDE TO LEAVE FLEXIBILITY. MY QUESTION, I GUESS IS HOW MUCH MONEY IS IN THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT. THAT'S NOT ASSOCIATED WITH OUR MONEY. SO THAT SHOULD SOMETHING GO WRONG. WE DO HAVE MONEY IN THERE TO FIX THOSE EMERGENCY THINGS. HOW MUCH OF THAT MONEY THAT WE PUT IN THE BUDGET THIS SUMMER IS LEFT IN THAT ACCOUNT. THANKS JASON. I THINK THAT WOULD GIVE ME SOME SENSE OF WHAT? MY LEVEL OF FLEXIBILITY. YOU'RE RIGHT AGAIN. MY NAME IS JASON KANYE WELL, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR AT LOCAL PARKS AND RECREATION COUNCILOR KRAMER. THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. UM FY 24 WAS A LITTLE BIT OF A UNIQUE YEAR FOR US AS FAR AS THE CAPITAL BUDGET GOES. BECAUSE YOU REMEMBER THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECTS THAT PASSED THAT A COUNCIL WAS A LIST. THAT'S THE LIST THAT WE WERE GOING OFF OF. THERE WAS NO FLEXIBILITY THERE BUILT IN THIS WAY. THE ORDINANCE WAS WRITTEN IN FY 24. WE ALSO RECEIVED A MILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF GENERAL PARA MONEY, WHICH THAT'S THE FLEXIBILITY THAT YOU KNOW THE BROKEN WINDOWS THINGS THAT WE DON'T PLAN ON THAT DAY WE HANDLE FOR THAT. SO THAT THAT'S THAT'S THE KIND OF THE TWO PARTS OF MONEY WE GOT. 24 THE FR. 24 DEFERRED MAINTENANCE NUMBER WAS LIKE 4.9 MILLION. I THINK SOMEWHERE 4.84 0.9, BUT WE'RE NOT GOING THAT OUT QUICKLY. WE'RE MAKING GOOD PROGRESS. UM SO YEAH, I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION. I THINK IT DOES, IF IT IF I MAY FOLLOW UP IT WOULD BE OKAY WITH ME AND I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO CHANGE ANY LANGUAGE, ACTUALLY, UM, WHERE YOU HAVE IDENTIFIED 12 POINT SOMETHING MILLION AND DEFERRED MAINTENANCE AS A LIST. THERE'S 13.2 MILLION HERE. IF WE LEAVE IT THE WAY IT IS, AS I UNDERSTAND IT. THAT ALLOWS YOU [01:00:07] TO DO THE THINGS ARE ON THE LIST, WHICH WE'RE EXPECTING YOU TO DO BECAUSE YOU SAID YOU'RE GOING TO AND IT LEAVES THE BALANCE TO TAKE CARE OF THOSE EMERGENCY KINDS OF THINGS AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK TO US TO SPEND THE BALANCE BECAUSE WE ALREADY ALLOCATED THE MONEY TO PARKS FOR DIFFERENT MAINTENANCE. IS THAT AMOUNT READING THAT RIGHT? OKAY I'M LOOKING AT MY FINANCIAL DIRECTOR. MAKE SURE I'M NOT SAYING SOMETHING. WE'LL BE IN FAVOR OF THAT. OKAY, SO WE COULD LEAVE IT ALONE. AND IT WILL. IT WILL ALLOW YOU SOME SMALL AMOUNT OF FLEXIBILITY. ASSUMING, OF COURSE, IT DOESN'T GET EATEN UP. BY INFLATION, RIGHT COST OVERRUNS. REMEMBER WHAT WAS WRITTEN IN THE F 24 ORDINANCE? I THINK WE HAVE TO REPORT MONTHLY ON STATUS. UPDATES. WE CAN EASILY ADD THIS ADDITIONAL MONEY TO THAT REPORT. WE WERE COMPLETELY TASK THAT YOU DO THAT AND WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO THE FIRST REPORT. OKAY, THANKS. COUNCILMAN ARTHUR. THANK YOU. QUESTION FOR KEN. IT FEELS LIKE THE METRO COUNCILS GETTING RUSHED, BUT I LIKE TO TURN THIS AROUND THE RUSSIAN ADMINISTRATION. CAN YOU HAVE PROPOSALS VETTED, REVISED AND FINALIZED BEFORE THE NEXT COMMITTEE, SO WHEN WE COME BACK, WE CAN HAVE AN INFORMED DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS FUNDING. BEFORE THE NEXT COMMITTEE BEFORE THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING BEFORE THE NEXT COMMITTEE. WE COULD HAVE THEM REVIEWED. INVENTED THEY MAY NOT BE FULLY READY TO GO, BUT WE WILL BE ON OUR WAY AND WE COULD WE COULD PROBABLY BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS SOME ASPECTS OF THOSE. OKAY AND WHEN YOU PUT THOSE PROPOSALS TOGETHER , COULD YOU ALSO GIVE US REVISED GOALS? BECAUSE WHEN WE APPROVED THIS FUNDING THAT FULL 40 MILLION. IT SAID. WE WOULD HIRE EX PEOPLE TRAINING ITS PEOPLE, AND I WANT TO SEE HOW THAT'S IMPACTED NOW THAT THE HEALTHCARE CEO GROUP IS NOT INVOLVED. COUNCILMAN ARTHUR THIS IS MEGAN MCCAFFERTY AND THE DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL FOR MAYOR GREENBERG. WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF, UM, WE'VE ACTUALLY GIVEN NOTICE TO THE CEO C OF OUR RIGHT TO INSPECT AN AUDIT THEIR RECORDS. UM SO THEY ONE WEEK'S NOTICE, AND THEN WE'RE ENGAGING OUR AUDIT FIRM TO CONDUCT IT AN AUDIT. WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT. COMPLETE BEFORE WE CAN FINALIZE EXACTLY, UM WHAT THE FULL ITEMIZATION OF THOSE PROJECTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE FORMER SUB RECIPIENTS IN THE NEW GRANTEES BECAUSE SINCE THIS WAS A REIMBURSEMENT BASED SYSTEM WHERE, UM, THE SUB RECIPIENTS SPENT MONEY AND THEN SUBMITTED THOSE FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CEO. SEE THE COC THEN SUBMITTED THOSE REIMBURSEMENTS TO METRO, UM, TO THE OFFICE OF MEASUREMENT BUDGET. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE A FULL ACCOUNTING SO THAT ITEMS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN REIMBURSED TO, UM THE SUB RECIPIENTS ARE COUNTED IN THEIR, UM, NEW GRANTS. AND WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT ANYTHING THAT THEY'VE BEEN SUBMITTING FOR REIMBURSEMENT BUT HASN'T BEEN PROVIDED TO THEM BY THE COC THAT THOSE ALSO ARE IN THOSE GRADES. SO WE WILL BE CONDUCTING AN AUDIT WITH OUR OUR AUDIT FIRM AND MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE ACCOUNTED FOR ALL OF THOSE DOLLARS. WHEN DID YOU SAY THAT AUDIT WILL BE COMPLETE, SO WE HAVE TO GIVE ONE WEEK'S NOTICE. WE GAVE THEM THEIR WEEKS NOTICE TODAY, SO FOR ACCESS TO INSPECT AND AUDIT THEIR RECORDS SO IT CAN ONLY BEGIN AFTER NOVEMBER. 8TH WE DON'T HAVE A TIMELINE FOR WHEN THAT WILL BE COMPLETED, BUT WE ARE ENGAGING OUR AUDIT FIRM AND THIS IS A PRIORITY FOR US. SO LET'S COMMITTEES THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16TH. SO IF YOU'RE SAYING YOU HAVE TO AUDIT BEFORE WE COULD FINALIZE THOSE PROPOSALS. ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE PROPOSALS WON'T BE READY BY THE NEXT COMMITTEE? I JUST DON'T WANT TO COME TO COMMITTEE AND GAS AND HOPE AND DREAM. I WANT TO KNOW EXACTLY HOW WE'RE SPENDING THE PEOPLE'S MONEY, AND I'M VERY SURPRISED THAT THE ADMINISTRATION WOULD COME TO THIS COMMITTEE WITH THE EXPECTATION WE WOULD VOTE ON IT. WITHOUT KNOWING EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE CONTEXT OF HOW THIS MONEY IS BACK IN FRONT OF COUNCIL. WELL JUST TO EXPLAIN, SO THE TOTAL AMOUNTS HAVE NOT CHANGED REALLY FROM THE ORIGINAL ALLOCATION TO THE, UM CEO C TO CHANGING THEM NOW TO DIRECT GRANTS, SO THE TOTAL AMOUNTS WON'T CHANGE. WE'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN AT ALLOCATED TO THEM. VIA REIMBURSEMENT THROUGH THE INTERMEDIARY OF THE CEO. SEE THAT WE HAVE ALL OF THAT ACCOUNTED FOR, UM, SO WE'RE NOT CHANGING THE OVERALL TOTALS? UM, THAT AMOUNT IS SET. RIGHT AND WHEN I SAY WHAT WE'RE VOTING FOR, I MEAN THE SCALE AND SCOPE OF WHAT THOSE PROJECTS ARE. IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT'S STILL UNCLEAR , AND WE WON'T EVEN KNOW UNTIL THE PROPOSALS COME IN. THE PROJECT WILL REMAIN. THE [01:05:02] PROJECTS ARE THE SAME. THE PROJECTS ARE THE SAME. SO WE'RE NOT CHANGING THE SCALE AND THE SCOPE OF THEM WERE JUST MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE LINING UP ALL OF THE DOLLARS AND THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN REIMBURSED AND THAT WILL BE INCLUDED IN THEIR NEW GRANT AGREEMENT. UM THAT THE PREVIOUS REIMBURSEMENTS IF THEY HAVE ALREADY BEEN PAID, UM VIA CEO C N VIA O AND B, THAT WE WILL ACCOUNT FOR THOSE IN OUR AGREEMENTS, AND THAT IT'S HELPFUL TO HAVE THE AUDIT FOR THAT. DO WE HAVE DESCRIPTIONS OF THOSE? I'M SURE WE DID AT SOME POINT HAVE DESCRIPTIONS OF WHAT THOSE SUB GRANTEES WERE BEING ASKED TO DO. YES SO THOSE ARE THE THOSE ARE HELPFUL TO GET THOSE AGAIN. THOSE WERE THE THREE PROJECTS. VENTURE STUDIOS, THE CHEWY CAN'T THINK ABOUT THE ACRONYM STANDS FOR AND THEN THE RUSSELLS STATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT. JUST TO BE CLEAR. I ASKED TO SEE THOSE PROPOSALS, KEN SAID. THEY ASKED HIM TO TOURNAMENT TOMORROW. YOU ASKED ME TO TAKE OUT THE PARTS OF THE HEALTHCARE CEO COUNCIL. SO THEY'RE NOT THE EXACT SAME BECAUSE WE'RE STILL WAITING ON THOSE PROPOSALS TO COME IN, RIGHT? YEAH, THE SCOPE WILL BE A LITTLE DIFFERENT. I'M MAKING JUST NOT TO CONTRADICT. BUT THE SCOPE WILL BE A LITTLE DIFFERENT BECAUSE IT WON'T INCLUDE THE COMPONENTS FROM THE C E. O. C. RIGHT. I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR THEY ARE DIFFERENT. AND WE DON'T HAVE THEM YET. SO I CAN'T IMAGINE WE WOULD VOTE ON THEM TODAY WITHOUT KNOWING EXACTLY HOW THOSE DOLLARS WILL BE SPENT. THAT'S WHY I ASKED IF WE CAN HAVE THOSE READY TO GO BEFORE THE NEXT COMMITTEE TO HAVE AN INFORMED DISCUSSION. WE CAN WORK ON TRYING TO GET THAT READY. I JUST I'M SITTING HERE THINKING IT TOOK US THREE MONTHS ALMOST 3.5 MONTHS TO NEGOTIATE THE LAST SET OF SUB RECIPIENT AGREEMENTS. FOR THIS PROJECT, AND I BUT WE CAN WE CAN MAKE AN EFFORT. SOUNDS LIKE WE BETTER GET TO WORK AND HOPEFULLY AGAIN BEFORE THURSDAY, NOVEMBER THE 16TH. WE CAN COME IN HERE AND HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENING. AND IF THE SCOPE IS DIFFERENT, JUST BASED ON NOT INCLUDING THE HEALTHCARE CEO GROUP. IT SHOULD GO QUICK. REMEMBER WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THIS ALMOST A YEAR AGO? ALMOST EVERYBODY ON THIS COMMITTEE SAID THAT WE TRUST AND WE TRUST METRO UNITED WAY AND SO FORTH, AND WE WANTED TO SEE THEM THROWN. SO I'M THINKING THAT SHOULD GO PRETTY QUICKLY. BUT WE GOT TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO NOW THAT THEY'RE NOT CONNECTED TO THE HEALTHCARE CEO GROUP. THANK YOU CHAIR. SURE, COUNCILMAN HAWKINS. HMM AGAIN. I'M I'M GOING TO SAY I THINK THIS IS, UH, PREMATURE. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE ADMINISTRATION IS TRYING TO AVOID IT AND GET THE MONEY ALLOCATED SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD, BUT, UM, IT'S A LOT OF MOVING PARTS. I DON'T SET ON THIS COMMUNITY, BUT I WOULD RECOMMEND SOMEBODY MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE IS VERY GOOD. COUNCILMAN FOWLER. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR, SO I REMEMBERED WHAT I WANTED TO ASK BECAUSE I THINK I ASKED IT AND THEN WE GET SIDETRACKED. DO WE KNOW THE AMOUNT GOING TO URBAN LEAGUE AMOUNT GOING TO AMPED AMOUNT GOING TO METRO UNITED WAY IN MOUNT GOING TO THE FOUNDATION AND KNOW WHAT THE AMOUNT USED TO BE UNDER THE CEO CS AND I CAN GET THAT TO YOU. I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE GOING FORWARD UNTIL WE GET THOSE PROPOSALS FROM THEIR PROPOSALS WITHOUT THE CEO, C COMPONENT AND OUT OF THE MILLION DOLLARS FROM THAT THE C E. O. C HAS ALREADY ENCUMBERED DOES THAT INCLUDE THE $237,000 THAT WERE GIVEN TO THEIR EMPLOYEES FOR BONUSES? BONUSES WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE ART FUNDS, BUT YEAH, METRO GOVERNMENT WHAT GOT A GRANT? UM I RECONCILIATION SHOWING THOSE. YEP I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT. I DON'T GOT THAT FROM DAVID KAPLAN. OKAY? HI COUNCILMAN FELLER. WE DID NOT REIMBURSE THAT AMOUNT THAT THAT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO US AS PART OF A REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST, BUT IT WAS NOT ACTUALLY PAID TO THEM. OKAY, SO THEY DIDN'T GET THOSE BONUSES. AH I CAN'T CONFIRM WITH DID NOT FROM THIS MONEY, BUT THEY DID NOT GET MONEY FROM US FOR THAT. ALL RIGHT, UM. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE SECOND. MOTION'S BEEN MADE TO TABLE ALTHOUGH SOME FAVORABLE TAPE POINT THIS ITEM SAY I MHM. AND ALSO OPPOSED. NO, NO. MAYBE WE NEED TO OPEN IT UP. THERE CAN'T DETERMINE THAT. MY EARS AREN'T WHAT THEY USED TO BE. YOU CAN HAVE A QUICK QUESTION BEFORE WE DO THAT. UM YOU THIS ISN'T [01:10:06] DEBATABLE, NOT DEBATABLE. INCREASE CLARIFICATION PURPOSES COUNCILMAN BUT NOT TO CHANGE MINDS. NO I WOULDN'T. I WOULD JUST CLARIFICATION. PURPOSES UM, WELL, THAT'S OKAY. I WOULD TRUST SO WE ARE EITHER YES TO TABLE OR NO. TWO MOVE FORWARD. COUNCILWOMAN MCRANEY. YES. COUNCILMAN OWEN YES. COUNCILMAN. WHAT THE HELL? NO. MOTION STABLE FAILED. UM SEE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS AND COUNSELING. OWEN, WHERE YOU DID YOU HAVE YOUR QUESTION NOW? THAT'S THAT'S OKAY. IT WAS. THAT'S FINE. I HAD A QUESTION THAT HAS IS MOVED AT THIS POINT. THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN ARTHUR. IF THIS WAS HIS QUESTION OR NOT, BUT CAN YOU JUST CONFIRM WE GOT TWO COMMITTEES THAT ARE SCHEDULED LEFT TO POTENTIALLY DISCUSS THIS. I'M SORRY, BUT YOU SAY THAT AGAIN TO COMMITTEES TWO BUDGET COMMITTEES THAT ARE SCHEDULED. FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE CALENDAR YEAR. DON'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME. YES I WOULD SAY THAT. I DON'T KNOW. YOU KNOW OUR BUDGET COMMUNITIES TOO MUCH? YES, YES, CORRECT. THANK YOU. UM SEEING NO ONE ELSE IN THE QUEUE. THIS IS AN ORDINANCE. COMFORT. ROLL CALL. VOTE. PLEASE OPEN THE VOTING. COUNCILWOMAN MCRANEY. YES. COUNCILMAN OWEN YES. COUNCILMAN MULVIHILL. YES. SO YOU HAVE SEVEN. YES, SPOKE ABOUT HIS CLOSED. I'M SORRY. ONE ABSTENTION. AND NO PHONE IN ONE PRESENTS. THE ITEM PASSES WILL GO TO BUSINESS. WE HAVE. I DON'T . LET'S TAKE ITEM 12 AS WELL. AND THEN WE'LL GO TO THE TOP. 12 IS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 84 SERIES 2022 AN ORDINANCE NUMBER 82,023 RELATING TO FISCAL YEARS. 20,022 23 AND 2023 24 CAPITAL BUDGETS RESPECTIVELY. TRANSFERRING 4 MILLION $20,600 FROM THE UNALLOCATED BY POLICY AND INFRASTRUCTURE LOSS AGREEMENTS PROJECT TO VARIOUS CAPITAL PROJECTS YOUR MOTION MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND JUST BEFORE US I THINK. THIS SELF WHO'S SPEAKING. TO JENNIFER COMMAS ARE CURRENT DIRECTOR OF METRO PUBLIC WORKS. SO THAT WE'RE. THE ORDINANCE IN FRONT OF YOU IS TO ACCEPT FUNDS. OR TRANCE. SORRY TRANSFER FUNDS FROM ARE ALLOCATED BILL MONEY AND THOSE WOULD BE GOING TOWARDS OUR RIGHT SIZING FOR SAFE STREETS GRANT THAT WE WERE AWARDED. SEE WHAT IN A QUEUE. QUESTIONS. SEE NONE. IMPORTANCE COMFORTABLE CARVE UPS. PLEASE OPEN THE VOTING. COUNCILWOMAN MCRANEY. YES. COUNCILMAN COHEN. YES. COUNCILMAN. MOTHER HILL? [01:15:07] YES. GOOD MORNING IS CLOSER. THANK YOU. NINE YES, VOTES PASSED. THIS WILL GO TO CONSENT. THANK YOU VERY CONVINCING. I DON'T MOVE AROUND. GO BACK TO THE TOP HERE. COUNCILMAN PURPOSE. OKAY IN ORDINANCE PROGRAM, $7000 AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDS AND FOLLOWING MANNER $7000 FROM DISTRICT FIVE TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT BUDGET TO THE, UH ONE WEST CORPORATION FOR LIGHT AND GENERATOR PRODUCTION COSTS FOR THE WINTER WONDERLAND EVENT. YOUR MOTION. THANK YOU SECOND. OKAY? OKAY MR BURKE. SO TO SPEAK TO THIS ONE. YES THANK YOU. THAT'S TIMBERG. THIS IS A REQUEST FROM ONE WEST FOR $40,000 OF $86,000 EXPENDITURE FOR THE WINTER WONDERLAND EVENT THAT THEY HOLD THAT THEY WILL HOLD IN SHAWNEE PARK, DECEMBER 15TH THROUGH THE 17TH. THIS IS ACTUALLY A DRIVE THRU FESTIVAL THAT THEY'RE HAVING HAVING 200,000 LIGHTS AND MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT, FESTIVE THEMES AND HOLIDAY MUSIC GOING ON, SO IT SHOULD BE QUITE THE PLACE TO BE OVER THAT TIME PERIOD. UM, COUNCILWOMAN PURPOSES, ASKING IF ANYONE ELSE WOULD LIKE TO JOIN HER. SHE'S PUTTING 7000 OF THE $40,000 ASKED THAT THEY HAVE. THE TOTAL COST FOR THIS TWO DAY EVENT IS 86,000. THE OTHER MANAGERS COMING FOR PROFIT FUNDS ARE FUNDS OF ONE WEST. UM SO ANY QUESTION I DO WANT TO DISCLOSE THAT THAT COUNCILWOMAN PURVIS IS ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ONE WEST. IT WAS PROPERLY DISCLOSED IN THE APPLICATION, AND WE DO HAVE A TECHNICAL CHANGE TO THE TITLE THAT THIS IS ACTUALLY MONIES FOR THE LIGHT GENERATOR PRODUCTION COST ALL THE LIGHTS IN THE GENERAL OF GENERATORS. IT'S NOT PRODUCTION COST OF THE FESTIVAL AND SO WE WILL MAKE THAT TECHNICAL CHANGE IN THE TITLE. GOOD. QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS, SAYING THAT THIS IS AN ORDINANCE CONFERENCE. CARVEL PLEASE OPEN THE VOTING. COUNCILWOMAN MCRANEY. YES. COUNCILMAN OWEN THERE'S NO LONGER WITH US. COUNCILMAN MULVIHILL. YES. ONE LESS COOPERATION FOR THEIR PLAYERS. VOTING IS CLOSED. YOU HAVE SEVEN YEARS VOTES. THANK YOU, ADAM PASTORS FROM GLOBAL CONSENT. BECAUSE THAT'S IT. OH GOTCHA. YES, LET'S SEND IT OLD BUSINESS. I DON'T KNOW IT'S APPROPRIATE $4000 FROM DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FANS, THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT BUDGET SUPPORT IN YOUTH BASEBALL LEAGUE FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL CHRISTMAS PARTY. WATCHING THE SECOND BEFORE US. $4000 OF THE REQUESTED 7000. QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. SEE NONE. ALL THIS AND ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. CAN YOU POST? 700 PASSES. ITEM THREE IS APPROPRIATING $188 FROM DISTRICT FIVE CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS. CAPRA INDUSTRY STRUCTURE FUNDS TO PUBLIC WORKS FOR THE FABRICATION INSTALLATION OF STREET CENTER IN ORDER OF RYAN KING AT THE CORNER OF HOT COURT IN VIRGINIA AVENUE. THE SECOND IS BEFORE US QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. SEEING NONE. I'LL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. I POSED PASSES. ITEM FOUR IS AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING. THIS HAS BEEN HELD. I'M SORRY. IT'S A GREAT BIG NOTE. THIS IS I DON'T MY APOLOGIES. I DON'T FATHERS APPROPRIATING $188 FROM DISTRICT SIX CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS TO PUBLIC WORKS FOR FABRICATION INSTALLATION OF ST SOUND AND HONOR OF BISHOP WALTER A. JONES JR CURRENT QUESTION LAST NIGHT AND SOUTH 16TH STREET MOTION TO APPROVE PROMOTION SECOND BEFORE US QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. SEEING THAT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE, AYE, I SUPPOSE. YES 700 PASSES ITEM SIX AS A GREAT BIG ITEM BEING HELD SIGN AS WELL, [01:20:01] GOT IT AND SAW AT THAT TIME. I DON'T SEVEN IS AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATE $8000 FROM NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT FUNDS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER 2500 FROM DISTRICT 15 $4000 FROM DISTRICT 21 AND $1500 FROM DISTRICT 17 TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT BUDGET TO STAGE ONE. CHILDREN'S THEATER INC FOR PERFORMANCES AT GLOBAL FREE PUBLIC LIBRARIES. PROPER MOTION AND SECOND IS BEFORE US. LET'S LOOK IT HERE UP. YEAH WE'VE HAD A COUPLE OF EDITIONS SINCE I TURNED IT INTO THERE NEEDS TO BE . I THINK AN AMENDMENT. UM ONE WAS 1500 FROM YOUR OFFICE AND 1000 FROM DISTRICT EIGHT. I CAN TURNING THE EMAILS SO. THREE. OKAY UM, OKAY, SO IT'S NOW IT'S UP TO 10,500 THEY ORIGINALLY REQUESTED 39,000. THIS IS FOR PERFORMANCES THAT WILL BE IN THE GLOBAL FREE PUBLIC LIBRARIES. EACH COUNCIL PERSON WHO CONTRIBUTES CAN CHOOSE WHICH LIBRARY AND WHICH BOOK BUNDLE. UM THEY CAN HAVE AS PART OF THEIR STAGE ONE PERFORMANCES IN THEIR DISTRICT. THE THOUGHT WAS, THEY WOULD HAVE 52 PERFORMANCES IF THEY REACH THE 4 39,000, AND THAT WOULD BE TWO PER COUNCIL DISTRICT. UM SO WE ALREADY HAVE SOME COMMITMENTS NOW, UM, BUT IF ANYBODY ELSE WOULD LIKE TO COMMIT, WE'RE STILL LOOKING FOR MORE MONEY STILL PICTURE. PRETTY GOOD, SO WE HAVE THAT WELL. YEARS PROPOSED AMENDMENT THAT COUNCILMAN FOWLER IS GOING TO PROPOSE FOR YOU. CORRECT. 1000. 1500 FROM DISTRICT 12. OKAY? YEAH. YES YES, YES. UM WAS THERE SOMETHING IN THE DOCUMENTATION ABOUT IT? THEY DIDN'T GET A CERTAIN NUMBER. THEY COULDN'T DO ANY OF THEM ARE MY IMAGINING THAT? UM NO. UH, I THINK THEY PLAN TO DO WHAT THEY HAVE YOU WHATEVER IS FUNDED, SO EVEN IF ONE WAS FUNDED AT THEIR FINAL THANK YOU JUST CLARIFICATION. VERY GOOD NOW. I NEED A MINUTE 1500 FROM DISTRICT 12 AND $1000 FROM TAKE DISTRICT DATE. LIKE TO MAKE THAT IN THE FORM OF EMOTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH HERE A SECOND. SECOND THANK YOU. WE HAVE THAT AMENDMENT BEFORE US QUESTIONS ARE CONCERNED SEEING THAT ALSO FIGURE THE AMENDMENTS AI OPPOSED COUNSELING COUNSELOR. SORRY. SORRY YEAH. WHO IS IT? PRESIDENT WINKLER THAT HE WAS VERY KIND. SORRY THANK YOU. I JUST WANTED TO, UM, SAY, I SIT ON THE STAGE ONE BOARD AS A VOLUNTEER, IT'S NOW STANDING ORGANIZATION. UM I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY'S SUPPORT OF STAGE ONE AND THINK THESE ARE EXCITING PROGRAMMING IN OUR LIBRARIES. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. WE NOW HAVE THE AMENDED ORDINANCE. BEFORE WE TAKE THE VOTE ON AMENDMENT. WE DID RIGHT ANY AMENDMENT, BUT NOW WE HAVE THE AMENDMENT OR AMENDED ORDINANCE BEFORE SUCH CULTURAL ROGOVO, PLEASE OPEN THE VOTING. COUNCILWOMAN MCRANEY. YES. COUNCILMAN MULVIHILL. YES. VOTING IS CLOSED. YOU HAVE SEVEN YES, VOTES. VERY GOOD. I DON'T PASS. THIS WILL GO TO ALL BUSINESS BECAUSE OF THE AMENDMENTS. I DON'T EIGHT IS APPROPRIATING $624.63 FROM DISTRICT 15 AGREED DEVELOPMENT FUNDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO PURCHASE GARDENING SUPPLIES FOR INTERESTING COMMUNITY GARDEN. SORRY, PROBABLY MOTION A SECOND. SO I NEED TO SPEAK TO IT. BUT YOU'RE WELCOME TO UM, NO. THAT'S CAME FROM A VOLUNTEER ASKING IF WE COULD HELP SUPPORT THEM. SO UM THIS IS A SMALL THING THAT WILL HOPEFULLY GO A LONG WAY FOR THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY GARDEN. ALRIGHT QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS, SAYING THAT ALMOST IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. I POSED AS HAVEN'T ITEM PASSES. I DON'T KNOW IS AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $5500, AND THEY WERE DEVELOPMENT FUNDS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER. $5000 FROM DISTRICT EIGHT AND $500 IN DISTRICT NOW TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO THE HIGHLINE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES FOR THE HIRING OF IMPORTS ON STAFF PERSON TO ASSIST WITH THE INDEPENDENT FAMILY ASSISTANCE, FOOD PANTRY AND THE SENIOR LUNCH PROGRAM. PROMOTION. THIS SECONDARY GOOD. LITTLE CONFUSED, [01:25:09] BUT WE GOT IT ALL RIGHT. ARE YOU HERE TO SPEAK TO IT? ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD. IDENTIFY YOURSELF. BETSY FOSTER, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT FOR COUNCILMAN RENO WEBER, AND, UM, I THINK IT'S PRETTY SELF EXPLANATORY. THEY'RE ASKING FOR $10,000 TO HELP RUN THE FOOD PANTRY AS WELL AS RUN THE SENIOR LUNCH PROGRAM. UM IF YOU'RE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES. THEY ACTUALLY SUPPORT PEOPLE AROUND THE CITY, ESPECIALLY IN THE IMMIGRANT POPULATIONS, AND WE'D APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT. WE'RE DOING 5000. ANDREW COHEN IS DOING 500. AND COUNCILWOMAN FOWLER HAS OFFERED TO 50 WHICH IS NOT INCLUDED IN HERE, AND WE'RE HOPING THAT OTHER PEOPLE WILL PARTICIPATE AS WELL. VERY GOOD. SO YOU HAVE AN AMENDMENT COUNCIL AND FOLLOW YOU AMENDMENTS TO EDGE OR 250? YES OKAY AND COUNT COUNSELING OVER HILL. UM DISTRICT 10 WILL GIVE UP FOR ADULTS. THANK YOU. LIKE YOU. WE HAVE THE AMENDMENT BEFORE US ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENTS. AI HOLLY AND IMPOSED. YES SEVEN. NOW WE HAVE THE AMENDED ORDINANCE BEFORE US. PLEASE OPEN THE VOTING. COUNCILWOMAN MCRANEY. YES. GENTLEMEN, MULVIHILL. YES. SO YOU HAVE SEVEN YEARS OLDS. THANK YOU. ADAM PASSES WILL GO TO OUR BUSINESS. ADAM 10 IS APPROPRIATING $2500 IN DISTRICT EIGHT NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT BUDGET TO CENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE FOR A TABLE AT THE CHANGE MAKERS CONFERENCE. REDUCTION. PRODUCTION SECOND AGAIN. AGAIN. I DON'T NEED TO SPEAK TO IT. IT'S UNDER THE AMOUNT BUT YOU'RE WELCOME TO YOU'RE WELCOME TO VOTE, UM TO THE TWO OF THE SEATS WERE, UM, OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE FROM OUR OFFICE. THE REST OF THEM WERE DONATED BACK TO THE ORGANIZATION TO PROVIDE THE PUBLIC. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS SAYING THAT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. CAN YOU POSE SEVEN ITEM PASSES? 11 IS APPROPRIATING $4900 FROM NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT FUNDS AND VOLUME MANNER. $2100 FROM DISTRICT NINE AND $1400, EACH FROM DISTRICT 10 AND 12 TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT BUDGET TO COMMONWEALTH THEATER CENTER INC FOR EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH TURING. EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCES OF DRAGON UP. PROMOTION AND SECOND BEFORE US. THIS IS PRETTY SUFFIX. PLANETARY KNOWS ANYONE NEEDS TO SPEAK TO IT. BUT YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THAT'S WENT ON THIS AND ON ANYMORE. QUESTIONS ARE CONCERNED, SAYING THAT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. POST SEVEN PASSES. I DON'T. IS THAT IT? YES, VERY GOOD. 12 AND 13. ITEMS ARE NEXT ITEM IS A MOTION TO ADJOURN. THANK YOU DIRECTION. WE ARE ADJOURNED. [Adjournment Note: Agendas are followed at the discretion of the Chair. While an item may be listed, it does not mean all items will be heard and/or acted upon by the Committee.] THANK YOU. I * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.