[00:11:47]
METRO TV WILL BEGIN IN APPROXIMATELY 45 SECONDS.
[00:12:09]
MHM.[00:13:11]
AFTERNOON AND WELCOME TO PLANING AND ZONING. I'M COUNCILWOMAN MADONNA FLOOD CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE. I'M JOINED VIRTUALLY BY MY VICE CHAIR, COUNCILMAN SCOTT READ BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS.KHALIL BESTER, BEST THAT, SEAN. SORRY, KHALIL. COUNCILMAN ROBIN ENGEL. COUNCILMAN RENO WEBER COUNCILWOMAN BETSY RUIN COUNCILMAN PHILIP BAKER, AND WE'RE ALSO JOINED BY COUNCILMAN ANDREW OWEN, AND WE'RE ALSO JOINED VIRTUALLY BACK COUNCILWOMAN CINDY FOWLER. UM TAKE A. THE ITEM NUMBER ONE. WE'RE GOING TO SKIP OVER THAT, RIGHT THIS MINUTE. I'M WAITING TO HEAR FROM COUNCILMAN HAWKINS. UM TWO. YES. NO, WE'RE GOING. TO NOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO THE PUBLIC HEARING PART. OF THIS TODAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. I DON'T REMEMBER TO AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 49 01 49 OF FIVE R.
COOPER CHAPEL ROAD, 5001. COOPER CROSSINGS DRIVE IN 98 AND ONE PRESTON CROSSINGS BOULEVARD CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 10.07 ACRES AND BEING A LITTLE METRO CASE NUMBER 22 ZONE, 0164. MOST
[Call to Order]
. PROBABLY MADE BY COUNCILMAN BAKER AND SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN RUI, WE'RE READY[Roll Call]
FOR DISCUSSION. BRIAN DAVIS, LOUISVILLE METRO OFFICE OF PLANNING. FROM MY PRESENTATION[Pending Legislation]
TO COME UP HERE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS PLAYING COMMISSION DOCKET NUMBER 22 ZONE 1 64 FOR[00:15:03]
THE STORAGE PROJECT THE PROPERTIES IN QUESTION, OR 49 01 AND 49 05 R COOPER CHAPEL ROAD, 5001 COOPER CROSSINGS DRIVE AND 98 01 PRESTON CROSSING BOULEVARD . THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED METRO COUNCIL DISTRICT 24. THIS IS AN AERIAL PHOTO OF THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE. A PORTION OF THE SITE IS ALREADY DEVELOPED AS A MINI, UM MINI STORAGE FACILITY AND IN THE IN THE NEXT MAP OF PORTION OF THAT IS ALREADY ZONE C TWO, BUT THIS IS THESE ARE THE PRODUCTS. PROPERTIES ARE IN QUESTION. HERE'S THE ZONING MAP , AND SO THE BACK PORTION THAT YOU SEE BACK HERE WITH THE EXISTING FACILITY ON THERE, THAT'S ALREADY ZONE C TWO. BUT THE FLAGPOLE PIECE AT THE FRONT THERE AT THE CORNER OF PRESSING CROSSING COOPER CHAPEL THAT IS CURRENTLY SEE ONE. SO THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO REZONE THAT PROPERTY C TWO AND THEN EXPAND EXISTING FACILITY AT THE REAR. SO THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TO CHANGE THE NAME FROM C ONE TO C TWO. MAJORITY OF SCIENCE ALREADY SEE TO THE PREVIOUS PREVIOUSLY EXPLAINED THE ADVOCATES PROPOSING TO EXPAND EXISTING MINI STORAGE FACILITY WITH ABOUT 52,000 SQUARE FEET OF NEW BUILDING, UH, THE TOTAL SITE AREAS ABOUT 10 ACRES AND LOCATED IN SUBURBAN MARKETPLACE CORRIDOR AND VEHICULAR ACCESS WILL COME THE PRESSING CROSSINGS BOULEVARD. SO HERE'S THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HERE. THE EXISTING FACILITY AGAIN LOCATED THE REAR. THEY ARE PROPOSING A COUPLE OF THESE STORAGE BUILDINGS BACK THERE, AS WELL AS THE NEW TWO STORY, CLIMATE CONTROLLED BUILDING IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF BREAST AND CROSSINGS AND COOPER CHAPEL. THE INTERNS WILL COME OFF OF PRESSING CROSSING BOULEVARD AND HERE'S THAT ENTRANCE RIGHT HERE. THESE ARE SOME RENDERINGS THAT THE AFRICAN PROVIDED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING SHOW WHAT THE PROPOSED NEW STRUCTURE ON THE CORNER WOULD LOOK LIKE. THIS IS JUST A, UH, PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. THIS IS ANOTHER PHOTO. AND THEN HERE'S A PHOTO OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURES EXISTING FACILITY, WHICH IS LOCATED AT THE BACK HALF OF THE PROPERTY THAT WE SAW IN THE PREVIOUS MAN. JASON SITE CLOSE TO THE NORTH. THE AFRICAN CONDUCTED THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. ME ON OCTOBER 19TH 2022 LAND DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING WAS ON JUNE 22ND 2023 AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING WAS ON AUGUST 17TH 2023, THE PLANNING COMMISSION MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES OWNING FROM C ONE TO C TWO IN THAT PASSED BY A VOTE OF 8 TO 0. THAT'S ALL THAT HAPPENED. CHEVY QUESTIONS FOR ME. BRIAN CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE MAP THAT SHOWS THE ENTRANCE? YES. UM. CAN YOU POINT THAT IS THAT CLOSE TO THE LAWS ENTRANCE OR IS THAT CAN YOU TELL BY THAT LOOK AT THE AERIAL NO. WELL NO. SO THE LOWS ENTRANCES WAY BACK HERE AND SO THAT THAT ENTRANCE IS MORE LIKE RIGHT HERE. I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION. THAT'S FOR COUNTY ATTORNEY CAN WE DO SOME VARIATION OF OUR STANDARD BINDING ELEMENT AS IT PERTAINS TO ENCASE THE PLAN CHANGED FOR SOME REASON. TRANSFUSED ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY SIDE I DON'T SEE WHY NOT WHAT? I'M TRYING TO CHECK AND BRIAN, DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW I'M ASSUMING THE NEW BINDING PROPOSED BY THE ELEMENTS MATCH WHAT'S ON THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE. I MEAN, THIS IS NOT TWO SIDES. DOCUMENTS CANNOT BE RIGHT. YEAH, IT'S GONNA BE KIND OF TREATED AS ONE DEVELOPMENT SITE. SO YEAH, THE BUYING ELVIS WOULD BE FOR BOTH PARTS OF IT. AND IF WE NEED A VARIATION OF IT, UM TO BE TWEAKED TO APPLY TO THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. I DON'T HAVE A THIS DEVELOPMENT. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WAITING TILL, UM, CANCEL NIGHT TO DO THAT. BECAUSE I'M I'M SORRY. I'M ASKING YOU ON THE FLY TO DO IT BECAUSE I JUST I WAS THINKING THAT THE STANDARD BUYING THAT WOULD GO IN THERE, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF ALL THE LANGUAGE WOULD APPLY. NO, IT SHOULD BE OKAY IN THIS CASE AND ANSWER ANYTHING THAT WOULD BE AN ISSUE PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOANS WHEN NEEDED VERY THINGS. THEY'VE ALREADY. I MEAN, THEY'RE THEY'RE YOU KNOW THEY'RE SHOWING THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS IN TOUCH. SO I CAN GO AND READ THAT. ANY SIGNIFICANT INCREASES TO THE PRO STRUCTURES . E G INCREASE IN THE BUILDING HEIGHT, NUMBER OF UNITS, NUMBER BUILDINGS, ANY INCREASE IN DENSITY ON THE PROPERTY, AND HE CHANGES AND USING THE PROPERTY, WHICH DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE THEREOF, AND OR ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE BINDING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN I TRADITIONAL NEW BINDING ELEMENTS TO I CHANGES DEFINING ELEMENTS. THAT REALLY UPDATE THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE OR THREE? I UPDATE EIGHT, UPDATING A PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS BINDING ELEMENT TO REFLECT THE CURRENTLY WHICH SHALL BE REVIEWED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WITH FINAL[00:20:01]
ACTION TO BE DETERMINED BY METRO COUNCIL. AND I MOVED THAT BINDING ELEMENT AND I THINK THAT WILL BE FINDING ELEMENT NUMBER 14. PROBLEM IN A SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR OF THE BINDING ELEMENT SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE AYE, THOSE OPPOSED BY LIKE SIGN SEEN ON THE MOTION CARRIES, UM AND I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT BINDING ELEMENT NUMBER EIGHT. SPECIFICALLY, UM GOES TO THE STREAM QUARTER PROTECTION AREA THAT'S LOCATED ON THAT DEVELOPMENT, SO IT IS BEING TAKEN CARE OF BY A BINDING ELEMENTS FROM GLAD TO SEE THAT SOMETIMES I THINK WE MISSED SOMETHING WHEN WE DON'T PUT SOMETHING IN THERE ABOUT THE BLUE LINE STREAMS THAT RUN THROUGH DEVELOPMENT AND THIS IS IN MY DISTRICT, AS HE SAYS, AND THIS IS JUST A FURTHER WE EXPECTED THIS TO COME BECAUSE OF WORK WHERE THE MINI STORAGE JERRY IS WE KNEW THERE WAS COMING THIS WAY. WE JUST DIDN'T KNOW WHAT IT WOULD BE SO UM AND THERE WAS NO OPPOSITION OUT THERE SO I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS AND RECEIVE ANYBODY ELSE'S. I DON'T SEE ANYBODY ELSE THEN SO WE ARE READY TO VOTE. HOLD ON. WE HAVEN'T. SINCE I'M GOING TO TAKE THE TIME THEN SINCE WE'RE TRYING TO DO THIS REAL QUICK THAT WE WERE JOINED BY COUNCILWOMAN HAWKINS AND COUNTY COUNCILWOMAN CHAPEL AS WE BEGAN THE THIS MEET THIS PART OF THE MEETING, UM AND ALSO I'LL READ REAL QUICK DISCLAIMER OF THIS MEETING IS BEING HELD PURSUANT TO KRS 61.826 AND CANCEL RULE FIVE. A. NO, I DON'T. WE SEE. MADAM SURE, I'M NOT GETTING A REFRESH TO VOTE ON MY SCREEN. WE ARE WE ARE NEITHER HOLD ON ONE SECOND. SOMETHING POPPED UP NEXT TO PLANNING IS OUR COMPUTER THAT WHEN SHE DID THAT THAT MATTERS. I READ MORNING THANK. YEAH.WELL, WHEN WE FIRST TOOK OFFICE , EVERYTHING WAS AUDIO AND WE TAPED IN THE COMMITTEE MEETINGS IN THE. COMMITTEE ROOM RIGHT ACROSS FROM THE RECEPTIONIST OFFICE. YEAH, IT'S JUST, UH JUST SAYING AUDIO. THEN WE WENT TO ROLL CALL VOTES WITH THAT'S NICE.
SO DO WE MAY NEED TO DO REDO THE MOTION AGAIN. OKAY, OKAY. IS ANYBODY SHOWING UP? VOTING.
OPTION ON THEIR COMPUTER. NO, MA'AM. I'LL SAY IT, LIKE MY GRANDS, YOUNGEST GRANDSON SAYS. WE ARE GOING TO MAKE TECHNOLOGY WORK FOR US. 12.
IT MUST BE SOMETHING WITH TECHNOLOGY TODAY BECAUSE MY WORK CELL PHONE CHANGED EVERYTHING ON IT. IT'S NOT THE SAME AS IT WAS. 24 HOURS AGO. CHAIR, BLOOD. YES, YOU READ. YES. COMMITTEE MEMBER BAKER YES. REMEMBER RENO RENO WEATHER COMMITTEE MEMBER CHAPEL ? YES, MARUI. REMEMBER ENGEL? YES MEMBER BET, SEAN? YES. YES THANKS, 38. YES, FOLKS ON THIS WILL GO TO OH, BUSINESS AT OUR NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. MOVING BACK, 12. I DON'T NUMBER ONE, WHICH IS 23 0228, A PUBLIC
[Public Hearing]
[00:25:10]
HEARING PURSUANT TO LOCAL METRO CODE OF ORDINANCES 168.02 LETTER G FOR THE DETAILED DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN. NO PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN DURING THIS HEARING. AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO BRIAN. OKAY? GOOD AFTERNOON, BRIAN DAVIS LITTLE METRO OFFICE OF PLANNING.ALRIGHT THIS IS PLANNING COMMISSION DOCKET NUMBER 23 DDP 34 FOR THE PATH OFF CAME RUN PROJECTS LOCATED 45 16 CANE RUN ROAD IS LOCATED METRO COUNCIL DISTRICT ONE THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT AND THE ATLAS PROPOSING RESIDENTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE. THIS SITE IS PRIMARILY ARE FIVE A. THERE'S A SLIVER OF C TWO THAT GOES WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY , BUT THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS OWNED ARE FIVE A THE REQUEST BEFORE USE A REVISED DETAILED DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 128 UNIT, MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE OPEN. THERE'S A OPEN SPACE AND PRESERVED TREE CAMPAIGN HAS BEEN PROVIDED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THERE'S ONE ACCESS POINT, WHICH COMES FROM CAMERON ROAD. IN 2000. THIS THIS HAS A BIT OF A HISTORY ON THE SITE IN 2015, THERE WAS AN APPROVED PLAN FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE USE AT THAT TIME THE PROPERTY WAS REZONED O, R AND C ONE. IN 2020 TO THAT OFFICE DEVELOPMENT NEVER HAPPENED. SO IN 2022 NEW NEW PERSON OBTAINED THE PROPERTY, AND, UH, THERE WAS A APPROVAL GRANTED FOR PLAN FOR 106 UNITS. AND SO JUST GOING TO GO OVER THE HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS ON THE SITE. THIS IS THE PLAN AS APPROVED IN 2015, SO YOU CAN SEE THE MEDICAL BUILDINGS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PROPOSED. ON THE SITE. THEN IN 2022, THE SITE WAS REZONED TO R FIVE A. AND THEN THIS WAS THE PROPOSED PLAN FOR THAT SITE THAT THAT IT CONSISTED OF THE 106 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. AND THEN THIS IS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT IS BEING PROPOSED WITH THIS APPLICATION, AND SO THE AFRICANS PROPOSING 128 RESIDENTIAL UNITS , AND YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE KIND OF CLUSTERING OF THE BUILDINGS IF YOU WOULD, WHEREAS YOU KNOW, THIS 2022 PLAN EXTENDED ALL THE WAY TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARIES OF PROPERTY, AND THIS ONE IS CLUSTERED MORE ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THIS SITE. UM BOTH THE PLANS WHEN I SAY BOTH PLANT THEM INTO THE 2022 PLAN, AND THE 2023 PLAN FEATURE TWO STORY BUILDING A TWO STORY BUILDINGS. THE 2022 PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED THE UNITS FOR THREE AND FOUR BEDROOM UNITS IN THIS 2023 PROPOSED PLAN. THEY THE UNITS COMPRISED OF 23 AND FOUR BEDROOM UNITS. THE 2023 PROPOSED PLAN HAS 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE. UM AND WHEREAS THE 2022 PLAN HAD ABOUT 71,000 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE, AND THEN THE 2023 PROPOSED PLAN PRESERVES MORE OF THE EXISTING TWO PROPOSES TO PRESERVE MORE OF THE EXISTING TREE CAMPING BECAUSE OF THE WAY THAT THE BUILDINGS THE BUILDINGS ARE CLUSTERED UP TOWARDS THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE. THESE ARE THE RENDERINGS THAT WERE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. UM AS PART OF THE PRESENTATION AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THESE ARE SOME, UH, SITE PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. YOU CAN SEE THAT APPARENTLY VACANT. SO, UM THE DEVELOPMENT PLAYERS ORIGINALLY WENT BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. UH AND THAT MADE MEETINGS TO DEATH ON AUGUST 16TH 2023 THE DECISION THAT DAY ON THE MOTION WAS A 22 TIE AND SO THAT AUTOMATICALLY SEND IT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ITEM ON AUGUST 17TH 2023. THE MOTION, UH , WAS TO APPROVE THE REVISED DETAILED DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT PASSED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 3 TO 1. THERE WAS A LOT OF DEBATE ABOUT THE ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE CHANGE IN THE STYLES, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THE APPLICANT POINTED OUT DURING THEIR TESTIMONY WAS THAT, UM, UH, YOU KNOW, WITH WITH THE NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGAIN, YOU GET THE CLUSTERING TO THE NORTH, WHICH ENABLES THEM TO PRESERVE FROM THE EXISTING TREE CANOPY AND SOME MORE OF THE OPEN SPACE ON THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE ON THE SOUTHERN PART. THERE WAS ALSO DISCUSSION. UH, AT THE HEARING ABOUT YOU KNOW WHETHER THIS WAS KIND OF LIKE A YOU KNOW ABOUT. I'LL USE IT FOR BAIT AND SWITCH. BUT YOU KNOW WHAT WAS BEING DONE THERE. IN TERMS OF THAT THE AFRICAN DID DID MOVE FORWARD WITH, UH, OBTAINING BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE
[00:30:01]
ORIGINAL 2022 PLAN, BUT THEN PART WAY THROUGH THE REVIEW FOR THE FOR THE BUILDING PERMITS, THEY REALIZED THAT THEY WERE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO OFFER THAT PRODUCT AT THE PRICE POINT IN ORDER TO MAKE IT, UH, PUT IT IN A IN AFFORDABLE RANGE. AND SO THAT'S WHY THEY SUBMITTED THE REVISED PLAN. AND SO YOU KNOW, ALL THAT WAS TESTIFIED PART OF THE TESTIMONY THAT THEY PROVIDED AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING AND SO ULTIMATELY, AS YOU SEE, THE VOTE WAS 4 TO 3 TO 1. THE ONE ABSTENTION WAS FROM THE CHAIR WHO FELT THAT THEY SHOULD SHOULD HAVE CONTINUED THE CASE THAT DAY. UH THAT WAS THAT WAS HER OPINION. AND SO SHE CHOSE NOT TO CAST A VOTE OF YES OR NO WHENEVER THE MOTION WAS MADE. BUT YOU KNOW IN BUT AGAIN THAT THAT MOTION DID PASS FORWARD 43. SO I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. AND THIS IS PROBABLY FOR THE COUNTY ATTORNEY. I WANT TO SEE WHAT YOU JUST MENTIONED ABOUT THE PRICE THE PRICE. OF THE FOUR OF THE AFFORDABLE UNITS. IS THERE A CAT? UM ON AFFORDABLE UNITS THAT THEY CAN CHARGE OF. IS IT LIKE, IS IT FEDERAL OR STATE? CAP ONE. WHEN YOU DO THAT TYPE OF FINANCING THERE IS AND I THINK IT DEPENDS ON THE PROGRAM. I DON'T KNOW IF I COULDN'T TELL YOU WHAT THAT NUMBER IS, OR AND THEN GET. ADMITTEDLY WE DIDN'T SEE A REAL DEEP DIVE INTO THE SORT OF SPECIFIC NUMBERS AT PLAY HERE. UM BUT BRIAN'S CORRECTLY, THE GENERAL TESTIMONY WAS THAT BASICALLY THE COMBINATION OF THE RISE IN, UM BUILDING MATERIAL COSTS AND INTEREST RATES. MADE IT SO THAT THEY YOU KNOW, WE WEREN'T ABLE TO PURSUE A PROJECT AT THE AT THE FEDERALLY ENFORCED, UM PRICE POINT, SO I DON'T KNOW IF THAT MEANT THEY WOULD HAVE LITERALLY LOST MONEY OR THERE JUST WEREN'T ENOUGH PROFITS, BUT CERTAINLY WOULD HAVE TAKEN A HIT. IT'S BEEN A GREAT NUMBER OF YEARS SINCE I WAS INVOLVED IN RESIDENTIAL COMPLEXES. AND I JUST KNEW THAT BACK THEN IN THE DAY THAT IF IT WAS, SAY A HEADLONG, THERE WAS A PRICE POINT THAT THEY COULDN'T GO OVER IN ANY TIME THERE WAS ANY TYPE OF INCREASE. IT HAD TO HAVE FEDERAL APPROVAL FROM HUD TO DO ANYTHING WITH THE PRICE POINT THAT WAS JUST WANTED TO CLEAR THAT UP FOR MY OWN SELF, UM, COUNCIL MEMBER READ IS IN THE QUEUE. YES THANK YOU. MADAM CHAIR, BRIAN DID THE PUBLIC HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON THE REVISED PLAN? ALRIGHT YEAH. I MEAN BOTH BOTH THE DRC MEETING AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WERE OPEN MEETINGS. UM AND SO THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO COMMENT. SEE WE DID NOT HAVE ANYBODY COMMENT AT THE DRC MEANING AND I DON'T HAVE THE PLANE FISHING MINUTES IN FRONT OF ME. I CAN PULL THOSE UP REAL FAST, BUT I DON'T THINK ANY PUBLIC MEMBERS TESTIFIED NOW WE DID HAVE OR WE DID. OKAY. YES WE DID HAVE SOME PUBLIC AND I'LL LOOK AT THOSE PULL THOSE UP REAL FAST. SO I CAN LOOK AT THOSE BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE PLEASE, WE CAN GO ON TO SOMETHING ELSE OR SOMEBODY ELSE'S QUESTION. MAYBE YOU COULDN'T GET BACK WITH ME LITTLE BIT LATER BEFORE WE TAKE A VOTE ON THIS FOR BOTH YOUR BENEFITS. BRIAN'S ON PAGE 11 OF THE MINUTES MR JAMES JONES AND TINA BURNELL, BOTH OF WHICH SPOKEN OPPOSITION. AND THEIR THEIR COMMENTS ARE SUMMARIZED THERE AT THE BOTTOM OF PAGE 11 OF THE MINUTES. GOT IT. OKAY.THANK YOU. BUT THIS IS JUST A GENERAL COMMENT OR QUESTION? UM COMMISSIONER MAM'S ASKED THE APPLICANT WOULD BE WILLING TO ADD A BINDING ELEMENT THAT SAYS FUTURE CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WOULD GO TO METRO COUNCIL. MR ASHE BURNER STATED THEY WERE NOT AGREEABLE TO THAT REQUEST. BUT I MEAN, WE HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO USE WHAT CHAPTER WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW, RIGHT? AND I'LL ADDRESS THAT ONE TO ADDRESS THIS. I THINK BRIEFLY AT THE AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AS WELL. SO YES, THAT THAT COUNCIL HAS THE POWER OUR POSITION IN MY ARMY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHOULDN'T BE ATTACHING THE COUNCIL MONEY ELEMENT THAT'S REALLY COUNCIL'S DECISION TO CHOOSE WHAT CASES COUNCIL WANTS TO REVIEW AND SO I KNOW THAT I THINK IT'S ACCURATE THAT, UH, REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT AGREE TO THAT REQUEST. BUT EVEN IF THE REPRESENTATIVE HAD SAID, OH, WE'RE FINE WITH THAT. WE THANK COUNCIL SHOULD BUILD A MOVIE THE BODY TO CHOOSE WHETHER THAT COUNCIL REVIEWS IT REVIEWS THAT HEARING THAT'S NOT AUTOMATIC, SO WE WOULD HAVE STOOD IN THE WAY OF THAT, REGARDLESS OF WHICH WAY THE APPLICANT WAS AGREEABLE OR NOT. UM BUT CERTAINLY, AS PART OF THIS REVIEW WILL NOT NOT THE LITERAL REVIEW. BUT THE ORDINANCE THAT GOES ALONG WITH THIS REVIEW COUNCIL COULD ADD THE STANDARD BINDING ELEMENT ONTO THIS CASE IN CASE THERE WERE ADDITIONAL CHANGES IN THE FUTURE. SO WE CAN ADD THIS AT A LATER DATE OF THAT'S SOMETHING WE DECIDED TO DO. OKAY UM, I WOULD LIKE TO CALL ON I DON'T SEE ANYONE ELSE. DO YOU ANSWER THE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BEFORE I CALL ON COUNCILWOMAN HAWKINS? GO AHEAD, COUNCILWOMAN HAWKINS. THANK YOU. UM IT LOOKS AS IF THAT THIS SPACE HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR SEVERAL THINGS. UM IN THE LAST COUPLE OF FEW YEARS , SEVERAL PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED AND PROPOSED FOR THIS SPACE. UM. HMM AND AS FAR AS, UM
[00:35:04]
. I WAS IN THAT ZONING. COMMITTEE MEETING. AND THERE WAS ONE BOAT THAT WAS OPPOSED. BUT THAT WAS BECAUSE SHE DIDN'T GET ENOUGH INFORMATION IN A TIMELY MANNER. SOMETHING THAT I'M JUST A LITTLE CONCERNED, AND I NEED TO LOOK INTO JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE. AUGUST THE 21ST. I WAS THE 21ST, WHICH WAS SLIGHTLY A LITTLE AFTER THAT, UM, ZONING COMMITTEE. UM. 8300 COOPER CHAPEL THAT WERE. THE SAME IDENTICAL TOWN HOMES WERE PROPOSED, AND NO DURING THAT ZONING COMMITTEE. THEY STATED THAT LUMBER MATERIALS AND THINGS LIKE THAT HAD RISEN, WHICH I DO AGREE WITH THAT, BUT. I WAS JUST TRYING TO GET A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION, AND I JUST WANT NEED A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME TO LOOK INTO IT, UM, TO SEE KENDALL WHAT THE DIFFERENCE WAS FROM CAME ONE ROAD TO COOPER CHAPEL A WEEK LATER. SO UM, I'M JUST NOT GONNA JUST SAY IT'S BAIT AND SWITCH. I WANT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE PERTINENT INFORMATION. SO UM, I WOULD LIKE TO HOLD ONTO THIS SO I CAN HAVE A UM SO I CAN SPEAK TO MY CONSTITUENTS WHO ARE VERY CONCERNED WHO WAS KIND OF HELP IT SENT ON TOWN HOMES SO THEY COULD HAVE PRETTY TO FRONT YARDS , BACKYARDS, PLANTING TREES, THINGS OF THAT NATURE, SO I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO, UM HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS. WITH THE SO I WOULD LIKE TO HOLD THIS IF YOU WOULD GREAT. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING WILL JUST NOT CALL ITEM NUMBER EIGHT AND WE'LL JUST FINISH THE PUBLIC HEARING PART BECAUSE, OKAY, WE HAVE TO BUY LONG, BUT IF NO ONE ELSE HAS ANY QUESTIONS I CAN ANOTHER IS A LITTLE BIT CLUNKY FOR MOST DIVERS RECEIVE, BUT YEAH, I MEAN, IF THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS WE CAN CLOSE. PUBLIC HEARING PIECE AND THEN EITHER JUST HOLD ITEM EIGHT FOR CALLING. YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THE COMMITTEE WOULD LIKE TO DO WITH THEM. JUST FOR TIMING PURPOSES. THERE IS ONE ADDITIONAL CYCLE ON THIS ONE. FOR WHATEVER REASON, 11 75 RUNS FROM THE START OF 60 DAY COUNCIL HAS TO ACT RUNS FROM THE DATE. THE RESOLUTION TO REVIEW HIS FILED WHICH PUTS US AT ITS MID OCTOBER, WHICH IS AFTER THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING, SO WE DO HAVE ONE ADDITIONAL CYCLE IN THIS GREAT COUNCILMAN OWEN, I'M SORRY. ALSO, AS IT RELATES TO TIMING. I THINK IT'S I THINK IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE TO HOLD IT SO WE CAN KIND OF MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE BEING VERY THOUGHTFUL ABOUT THIS, BUT I DID WONDER. DO WE KNOW FROM THE APPLICANTS? PERSPECTIVE WHAT THEIR TIMING LOOKS LIKE WITH THEIR PUBLIC FUNDING. AND HOW? BECAUSE THERE ARE TIMEFRAMES ON THAT AS WELL. SO, UM DO WE KNOW THAT BASED ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC. MEETINGS AS TO WHERE WHETHER THEY'VE GOT TIME FRAMES. THAT THEY HAVE TO MEET THAT THAT THIS IS NOT GOING TO ALLOW THEM TO MEET. NOTHING THAT I'M AWARE OF. THAT ISSUE DIDN'T SPECIFICALLY COME UP AT UM PLANNING COMMISSION THAT I RECALL. I DO KNOW THAT IN THE WAY THE LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT CYCLE WORKS. I'M PRETTY SURE IN MOST STATES ANYWAY, YOU HAVE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME TO DEPLOY. UH THOSE THOSE FUNDS AND SO THAT'S THE REASON I'M ASKING THE QUESTION, BECAUSE IF WE'RE HOLDING IT, AND THEY'VE GOT TO A DEADLINE THAT THEY HAVE FACING.IT'S CREATING A PROBLEM. THAT'S TWO BEYOND WHAT WE'RE TAUGHT DISCUSSING. RIGHT AND LIKE I SAID, I DON'T KNOW WHAT WHAT? WHAT TIMELINES OR DEADLINES THEY MAY BE FACING IN THE PAST, IF THERE IS A RAPIDLY ENCROACHING DEADLINES. SOMETIMES I HAVE BEEN REACHED OUT TO AND SAID, HEY, THIS HAS TO MOVE BY X DATE OF THE PROJECT DIES. THAT HASN'T HAPPENED IN THIS CASE. THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THERE BEING NO TIME PRESSURE. UM BUT AGAIN, I JUST HAVEN'T BEEN MADE AWARE OF IF THERE IS A SPECIFIC LIVING DEADLINE IN THE NEAR FUTURE, OKAY, THANK YOU.
NO. THIS IS NOT. UM BUT BUT I DO KNOW FROM FROM THE PAST THAT ANYTIME WE ARE UNDER THERE'S SOMEONE AT A TIME CONSTRAINT WHEN IT COMES TO FUNDING WERE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. UM THE ONLY OTHER THING I WANT TO POINT OUT IS, UM YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY WE DIDN'T HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TODAY. WE DIDN'T TAKE ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY SO AS A AS COUNCIL REVIEWS THIS CASE BEFORE THE NEXTEETI, BE SURE TO STAY WITHIN THE EXISTING RECORD. THE DRC CASE, THE PLANNI COMMSION CE, T VARIOUS DOMENTS HAVE BEEN FILED UM SO TREAD SIMIL THI
[00:40:05]
CASETHAT WE 'S AN ADDITIONAL MONEY ELEMENT OR APPROVAL OR REVERSAL. SURE, I'LL BE BASED ON THE RECORD THAT'S BEEN ESTABLISHED. OKAY, SO I'M GOING TO CLOSE. THIS PORTION. THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THANK YOU, MISS HAWKINS FOR ATTENDING AND OFFERING YOUR INFORMATION THAT WILL SURELY HELP WITH OUR DECISION. AND THEN WE'LL MOVE TO. I NEED TO CALL THAT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE GOING TO BE HELD TODAY AT THE REQUEST OF THE SPONSORS OF THE LEGISLATION, EXCEPT FOR A ZONING CHANGES IN COUNSELING BLACKWELLS. DISTRICT WE WILL TAKE THAT UP AT THE NEXT COMMITTEE MEETING. SO ITEMS NUMBER 69, 10, 11 AND 12 WILL BE HELD 9, 10, 11 AND 12 HAVE TO DO WITH OTHER ITEMS THAT COME THROUGH ZONING, NOT ZONING CHANGES. OKAY, SO WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER THREE. WHICH IS AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO THE ZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 39 02 FIRM VALLEY ROAD CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.69 ACRES AND BEING A LITTLE METRO CASE NUMBER 23 ZONE. 0026 TO APPROVE SECOND. PROBABLY MADE BY CANCELING ENGLISH SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BAKER AND WE'RE ALSO JOINED, UM , COULDN'T SEE OVER MY SHOULDER.WE WERE JOINED SOME TIME AGO BY COUNCILWOMAN DOCTOR SHANKLIN. OKAY THIS IS PLANNING COMMISSION DOCTOR NUMBER 23 ZONE 26 FOR MK FLOORING. PROBABLY IS LOCATED 39 02 FERN VALLEY ROAD SKATE, LOCATED AND DISTRICT 21. THIS IS AN OUTLINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. YOU CAN SEE IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT AND IS BETWEEN TWO ADJOINING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS. THIS IS A ZONING MAP OF THE AREA. THE PROPERTIES CURRENTLY ZONED R FOUR. THEY ARE PROPOSING TO CHANGE THAT, UM ZONING TO SEE TWO. AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE ARE SOME OTHER COMMERCIAL ZONE PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE AREA, INCLUDING THE TWO ADJOINING PROPERTIES TO THE EAST AND THE WEST. SO THE REQUEST BEFORE WE USE THE CHANGES ZONING FROM OUR FOUR TO R C TWO. UH THE ATMOS CONSTRUCTING A CONTRACTOR SHOPS ABOUT 6000 SQUARE FEET AS WELL AS AN ACCESSORY BUILDING. IT IS CURRENTLY A VACANT SITE WITH ACCESS COMING FROM FERN VALLEY ROAD. HERE IS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED IN REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. FERN VALLEY ROSE AT THE MAP TOP AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED CONTRACTOR SHOP HERE AND AS WELL AS THE PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING IN THE BACK, WHICH IS ABOUT 3000 SQUARE FEET. THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. THESE ARE SOME. THIS IS A PROPERTY ACROSS FERN VALLEY ROAD. THIS, UH, ADJACENT SITES.
THE ATHLETE CONDUCTED THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ON JANUARY 30TH 2023 LAND DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETINGS ON JULY 13TH 2023 AND THE PLANNING QUESTION PUBLIC AGREEMENTS ON AUGUST 17TH. THE PLAYING COMMISSION MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CHANGING ZONING THAT FROM OUR FOUR TO SEE TO THAT PASSED BY A VOTE OF 8 TO 0, THAT'S ALL I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS FOR ME. UM, I'LL START OUT WITH THE QUESTION. UM. WOULD IT BE PROPER ? UM PERMISSIBLE TO DO A BINDING ELEMENT THAT FOR NO OUTSIDE STORAGE. UM SO THAT'S WHEN I WOULD NEED TO DISCUSS WITH THE APPLICANT UM I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE ANY DOESN'T CURRENTLY HAVE ANY PROPOSED. BUT STILL, THAT WOULD BE BE THE ELIMINATION OF SOME POTENTIAL. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY OPT OUT MY HEAD WITH DANA CP FOR THAT BRAND. THEY NEEDED. THEY WOULD NEED A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN ORDER TO DO, UH, OUTSIDE STORAGE. SO THEY DID NOT REQUEST THAT AT THIS TIME SO NOT CURRENTLY PROPOSED. BUT IF WE WANT OUTRIGHT PREVENT THAT, THEN I NEED TO HAVE A DISCUSSION TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE OKAY WITH THAT. WHERE WE CAN. I UNDERSTAND THAT BONDING ELEMENT TO RIGHT AND THAT WOULD COVER WAS THAT COVER THE YES. SO WE CAN WE CAN UNDERSTAND BY THE ELEMENT THAT WOULD, UM ASSUMING THAT THE CPI WAS ACCOMPANIED BY, YOU KNOW THE KIND OF SITE CHANGE THAT WOULD TRIGGER THE STANDARD MINING ELEMENT, THEN THEY WOULD COVER IT. AND I UNDERSTANDING, BITING ELEMENT BY ELEMENT. COUNCILWOMAN SHANKLIN, CAN YOU HEAR ME? THE SECOND AND WITH YOUR PERMISSION, CAN I ADD BINDING ELEMENT THAT WOULD THE STANDARD BINDING ELEMENT IF THERE'S A CHANGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ETCETERA
[00:45:02]
ETCETERA THAT IT COMES BACK IN FRONT OF THE METRO COUNCIL, SINCE IT IS A C TWO, WHICH ALLOWS A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS, AND IT'S CLOSE TO THE SLAUGHTER ELEMENTARY. YES, THAT'S THAT'S FINE WITH ME. I'M HAPPY TO READ THAT IN, BUT JUST TO DOUBLE CHECK. THIS CASE, THE COUNCILMAN RELEASED DISTRICT CORRECT LET'S SEE. IT'S NOT. I'M SORRY. I KNOW THAT'S WHAT I WAS LIKE. I'M CONFUSED. YEAH, IT'S 21. YES. I'M SORRY. I'M I'M SEEING FIRM VALLEY ROAD AND, UH , WE'RE GETTING AN EAT TEXT WEIRD OVER THERE. SHE'S HAD ONE SIDE OF THE STREET. SOME PLACES AND I HAVE THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET AND IT SWITCHES. SO ANYWAY, I'M GOOD WITH IT. IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU? OKAY, GO AHEAD. ANY SIGNIFICANT INCREASES THE PRO STRUCTURES INCREASES IN BUILDING HEIGHT NUMBER UNITS, NUMBER BUILDINGS, ANY INCREASE IN DENSITY ON THE PROPERTY, AND IT CHANGES AND USE ON THE PROPERTY, WHICH DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY. OKAY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR SUBCOMMITTEE THEREOF, AND OR ANY ADDITIONAL BINDING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN I ADDITION OF NEW BINDING ELEMENTS TO I CHANGES DIVIDING HONEST THAT MERELY UPDATE THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE OR THREE. I UPDATING A PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS BINDING ELEMENT TO AFFECT THE CURRENT LANGUAGE SHOULD BE REVIEWED SHALL BE REVIEWED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WITH FINAL ACTION TO BE DETERMINED BY METRO COUNCIL. I MOVED THEM AMENDMENT. PROBABLY NEVER MOVED IN SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MINUTES SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE POSED BY LIKES.LIKE SON, HARRY. NONE. THE MOTION CARRIES. UM I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION BEFORE I CALL ON YOU, COUNCILMAN REED, UM. THERE WAS MENTIONED BY COMMISSIONER CARLSON ASKED IF THE APPLICANT MAY BE ABLE TO FOR ABLE TO ADD ADDITIONAL ANIMATING FEATURES ON THE FACADE FACES FIRM VALLEY ROAD AND THEIR APPLICANTS. ATTORNEY SAID THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO EDIT BINDING ELEMENTS , SAYING THAT THE FINAL DESIGN DESIGN WOULD BE PRESENTED TO STAFF. IS THAT ALREADY COVERED BY BINDING ELEMENT BECAUSE I DIDN'T SEE IT. IT WAS THREE C THREE C. OKAY HIS FINAL ELEVATION SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS PRESENTED AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING WITH ARTICULATING FEATURES AROUND THE PEDESTRIAN DOOR AND WINDOW DOOR. GOOD YES, COUNCILWOMAN RUI! OKAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH. CAN YOU GO BACK INTO YOUR PRESENTATION FROM YOU WENT PAST THE SCREEN THAT I HADN'T SEEN EARLIER. SOMETHING ABOUT UM THE DETENTION, BASIN AND STUFF. MHM. SO ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE THEY ARE HAVING TO DETAINED SOME OF THE WATER PROVIDE DETENTION AREA. AND SO THAT IS AT THE FRONT OF THE OF THE DEVELOPMENTS ON THE FRONT OF NEAR FERN VALLEY ROAD. AND SO THIS LITTLE CIRCLE HERE THAT YOU SEE THAT'S THE PROPOSED ATTENTION BASIN. IT'S NEXT TO THE TO THE INSTANT ENTRANCE DRIVE. AND THEN, OF COURSE, BURN VALLEY ROAD. OKAY. SO IS THAT. THE SCREEN THAT YOU WERE SHOWING SAID SOMETHING ABOUT A PARKWAY BUFFER AREA THAT WAS GOING TO INFRINGE ON. OH THAT WAS FOR SO THERE WAS A WAIVER. OKAY YEAH, YOU KNOW? YEAH IN ORDER FOR THE DETENTION BASIN TO BE LOCATED IN THAT SPOT, THEY HAD TO REQUEST A WAIVER FROM THE PARKWAY BUFFER, WHICH THE PLANNING QUESTION DID VOTE TO APPROVE. OKAY SO LARGELY THAT AREA AT THE FRONT IS ALL GOING TO BE GREEN SPACE. THEN THAT IS CORRECT. YES YOU HAVE THE ENTRANCE DRIVE. YOU HAVE THE BASIN. UH AND THEN YOU KNOW YOU HAVE A COUPLE OF PARKING SPACES BETWEEN THE BASIN AND THE BUILDING, BUT YEAH, THERE THERE WILL STILL BE THE DETENTION BASIN. UH, HERE AT THE FRONT, AND THEN THEY WOULD HAVE COMES AROUND TREES. ALONG THIS PROPERTY LINE. SO. OKAY. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? MY PAPER . JENNA DOESN'T MATCH UP TO THE ONE IN THE COMPUTER BECAUSE MONTHS, THE MORE THAT WAS SENT OUT. SO IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT, AND SOMETHING'S NOT LINING UP IT'S OKAY. OKAY, WE'RE.
WITHOUT OBJECTION, VOTING IS CLOSING. THERE ARE EIGHT YES VOTES AND THIS WILL GO TO OLD BUSINESSES. OUR NEXT MEETING. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR, WHICH IS AN ORDINANCE RELATING
[00:50:08]
TO THE ZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED 97 18 DIXIE HIGHWAY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 2.55 ACRES AND BEING IN LITTLE METRO CASE NUMBER 23 ZONE 00. TO NINE MOTION APPROVED. PROBABLY MEANT BY COUNCIL IN ENGLISH SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BAKER. WE'RE READY FOR DISCUSSION PLAYING QUESTION DR. NUMBER 23 ZONE 29 FOR DIXIE HIGHWAY VENUE PROPERTIES LOCATED 97 18 DIXIE HIGHWAY LOCATED METRO COUNCIL DISTRICT 14. THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OUTLINED IN BLUE HERE IS CURRENTLY OR HAS BEEN USED FOR AS AN INSTITUTIONAL USE. THE CHURCH IS PROPOSING TO USE IT FOR AS AN EVENT VENUE SPACE FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY. SO THIS IS THE ZONING MAP, AS YOU CAN SEE, ON THE EAST SIDE OF DIXIE HIGHWAY, YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF ZONING, UM, PARTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES.ZONING IS PRIMARILY ARE FOUR ON THE WEST SIDE OF DIXIE HIGHWAY THAT IS PROPOSING THE CHANGE THIS USE FROM OUR FOUR TO C TWO. SO THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU CHANGE THE ZONING FROM ON THE SITE FROM OUR 4 TO 2 C TWO UM, IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH THE RELIGIOUS STRUCTURES PROPOSALS TO REZONE THE SITE IN ORDER TO USE THE EXISTING STRUCTURES FOR WEDDING VENUE AND EVENT SPACE.
WITH ONE PROPOSED SHORT TERM RENTAL UNIT AND ONE OF THE STRUCTURES. SO THIS IS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BASICALLY HAVE THE SITE EXISTS WITH SOME SOME MINOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARKING ON THE SITE YET THE EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING ON THE RIGHT OF THE PLAN, AND THEN TO THE LEFT, THERE'S AN EXISTING BUILDING THAT THAT WOULD BE USED FOR THE RECEPTION HALL AND LODGING AS WELL AS CONTAINED THE SHORT TERM RENTAL FOR PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE UTILIZING THE EVENT SPACE. THIS IS JUST A PHOTO THE SUBJECT SITE AGAIN. THE CHURCH ON THE RIGHT THE SPACE ON THE LEFT. THE ATHLETE CONDUCTED THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD ME ON OCTOBER 6 2022 AND DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION MEETING WAS ON JULY 13TH 2023 AND THEN THE PLANNING COMMISSION. PUBLIC HEARING WAS ON AUGUST 17TH 2023. THE MOTION WAS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. THE CHANGES OWNING FROM OUR FOUR TO SEE TO THAT PASSED BY A VOTE OF 8 TO 0. THAT'S ALL THAT I HAVE IN SHAPE QUESTIONS FOR ME. I HAVE NO. ONE. CUTE ANSWER. I'D LIKE TO ASK SOME QUESTIONS. I'M NOT IN THE QUEUE, THOUGH. SORRY THAT OKAY, GO AHEAD. I'M CURIOUS. I TALKED, THEY REFERENCED IN THE THING ABOUT THE DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR PLAN ON THAT. AND SOME CHANGES IN THAT. CAN YOU SPEAK TO HOW THAT AFFECTS THE DEVELOPMENT? IT WAS IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. THE STAFF REPORT. IT WAS ACTUALLY IN THE PRE COMMITTEE NOTES. I THINK I WAS READING THE REFERENCE THAT OKAY SOME BINDING ELEMENTS RESTRICTING EVENTS WITH MORE THAN 10 GUESTS. UM AND SPECIFICALLY WHEN THE THESE EVENTS WOULD BE ENDING. AND JUST , UM OKAY, LET ME STEER THE SUMMARY IN HERE. LOCATED IN THE DIXIE HIGHWAY QUARTER MASTER PLAN. THE PLAN SUGGESTS CHANGING THE FORM DISTRICT FROM SUBURBAN MARKETPLACE QUARTER IN TOWN CENTER. SO IS IT SO IT IS CURRENTLY SUBURBAN MARKETPLACE AND THE TOWN CENTER? IS THAT WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR THEM? THEY'RE NOT ASKING FOR THAT AND THIS REQUEST, BUT IN THE DIXIE HIGHWAY PLAN IN THE PLAN, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF KIND OF NODES WHERE THEY'RE PROPOSING TOWN CENTER FORM DISTRICT IN ORDER TO HELP UH, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ACTIVITY AND DENSITY IN THESE AREAS IN IN REALLY, TO GIVE SOME AREAS OF DIXIE MORE CHARACTER THAN TO ESTABLISH MORE OF A PLACE FIELD ALONG THE CORRIDOR.
AND SO THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ONE OF THOSE DISTRICTS, NOTHING IS GOING BEYOND THE DIXIE HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN YET, BUT THIS ISN'T ONE OF THOSE AREAS WHERE THAT WAS IDENTIFIED AS A POTENTIAL TOWN CENTER FORM DISTRICT AREA. BUT AGAIN, NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE TO CHANGE THAT FOREIGN DISTRICT OR LIKE ADDITIONAL STUDIES TO IMPLEMENT THAT TYPE OF RECOMMENDATION FROM THAT MASTER PLAN. OKAY, SO HOW DID HOW DOES THIS COMPLY WITH WHAT THEIR WISHES ARE? WELL IT WOULD BE A, UH, YOU KNOW AGAIN, IT WOULD. IT WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL AREA WITHIN THAT TOWN CENTER AREA. SO AGAIN KIND OF A YOU KNOW, WITH THE COMMERCIAL ZONING YOU MAY HAVE UH, I WILL SAY POTENTIAL CHANGE IN USE, BUT JUST ADDITIONAL ACTIVITY. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS SOUGHT THAT THAT THE MAD, UM, MASTER PLAN. UH IS SEEKING FOR THAT PARTICULAR AREA, SO WE'RE JUST BEING ADDITIONAL HELP ATTRACTION OR ITEMS THAT PEOPLE COULD GO TO AND FROM FOR WHATEVER REASON THAT WOULD BE IN THAT THAT PROPOSED TOWN CENTER AREA. OKAY
[00:55:02]
THANK YOU. I MIGHT ADD ONE NOTE. I MEAN, THEY'RE JUST THIS. UH THIS SITE IS AN ADAPTIVE RE USE OF SOME OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND IF THEY WERE TO COMPLETELY REDEVELOPED THE SITE AND CHANGE INFORMED DISTRICT PROBABLY EASIER TO ACCOMPLISH, BUT IT CAN BE DIFFICULT TO SORT OF RETROFIT EXISTING SCIENCE WITH THE FORM DISTRICT CHANGE. SO IF THIS WERE TO TRULY REDEVELOPED INTO A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THING, I THINK IT POSSIBLE, ESPECIALLY IF THE SURROUNDING AREA THAT MAY BE A FORM DISTRICT CHANGE MIGHT BE CONTEMPLATED AT THAT TIME. OKAY.THANK YOU. I'M JUST CURIOUS BECAUSE WE'RE WORKING ON MASTER PLANS IN OUR IN OUR DISTRICT.
ALSO ANYONE MAKE SURE THAT THEY ACTUALLY GET FOLLOWED. COUNCILMAN VALOR. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD ON THAT? YES I DO. PLEASE AND SO, UM. I HAVE A QUESTION. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S FOR BRIAN OR FOR TRAVIS. BUT CURRENTLY THE HOUSE THAT SETS ON THAT PROPERTY IS BEING USED AS A RENTAL, NOT A SHORT TERM RENTAL. BUT A RENTAL IS HOW DOES THAT AFFECT THIS? DEVELOPMENT PLAN, OR DOES IT. WELL THE ZONING CHANGE WOULD NOT AFFECT THAT BECAUSE YOU CAN DO RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ZONE PROPERTIES, SO THERE'S NOTHING WOULD CHANGE THAT UNTIL THEY CHOSE TO MOVE FORWARD AND IMPLEMENT THE PLAN SO THAT NOTHING WOULD BE DONE. UH NOTHING. YOU KNOW IT WOULD.
IT WOULD NOT MAKE IT A NONCONFORMING USE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING. WELL, WHAT I'M ASKING IS ONCE THEY GET EVERYTHING IN PLACE IS WILL. THEY STILL CAN BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO RENT THAT HOUSE OUT? YES WELL SO THEY COULD THEORETICALLY BUT AT SOME POINT, IF THEY CAN, IF THEY START USING THIS AS AN ACTUAL, YOU KNOW, EVENT VENUE AND SORT OF RELATED PLACE FOR THE WEDDING GUESTS OR THE WEDDING PARTY TO SLEEP. THEY'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN A FULL TIME LESSEES, PROBABLY OF THAT BUILDING, SO I IMAGINE AT SOME POINT IN THE NEAR FUTURE, THAT LEASE WILL BE CONCLUDED, AND THEY WILL NO LONGER HAVE A LONG TERM RENTAL ON THIS SITE. DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE PREVENTED FROM, BUT IF THEY DO, YOU KNOW REALLY ENGAGE IN THIS EVENT, MANY BUSINESSES, IT'LL PROBABLY DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN. THAT WITH A LONG TERM RENTER. BUT THERE'S NOTHING THAT PROPOSED THEM FROM DOING THAT CORRECT. IF THEY CHOOSE TO GO AHEAD AND KEEP PART OF THE HOUSE IS A RENTAL. IT WOULD IT WOULD BE OKAY, CORRECT. OKAY UM, AND THEN I WANTED TO POINT OUT JUST JUST FOR THE RECORD THAT THIS ISN'T A DRAFT PRECINCT. UM ALONG THAT STRETCH OF DIXIE HIGHWAY, UM SO UM. I'M ASSUMING. I KNOW THEY KNOW THAT BECAUSE I DISCUSSED THAT WITH THEM. UM AND THEN I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THE STANDARD BANDING ELEMENTS THAT WE NORMALLY DO, ESPECIALLY FOR C TO USE. AND I CAN READ THAT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT INCREASES TO THE PRO STRUCTURES. UG INCREASED BUILDING HEIGHT MEMBER UNITS, NUMBER OF BUILDINGS, ANY INCREASE IN DENSITY ON THE PROPERTY ANY CHANGES IN USE ON THE PROPERTY, WHICH DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR SUBCOMMITTEE THEREOF, AND OR ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE BINDING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN I CONDITION OF NEW BINDING ELEMENTS TO I CHANGES TO BINDING ELEMENTS THAT MERELY UPDATE THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE OR THREE. I UPDATING A PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS BINDING ELEMENT TO REFLECT THE CURRENT LANGUAGE. SHALL BE REVIEWED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THE FINAL ACTION TO BE DETERMINED BY METRO COUNCIL.
THANK YOU, TRAVIS. AND UM, JUST APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT ON THIS ONE. AND I MEAN I'LL SECOND THAT AMENDMENT. WE BUST 70 FOWLER, COUNCILWOMAN FOWLER AND SECONDED BY MYSELF, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE NEW BODY ELEMENTS SAYING I THAT WAS OPPOSED BY THEM BY LIKE SIGN. HEARING NONE. THE MOTION CARRIES. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? COUNCILWOMAN FOWLER. NO, THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
THIS IS KIND OF LIKE YOUR NECK GETS A LOT OF EXERCISE HERE BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE I CAN'T SEE ANYBODY THAT FAR AWAY. NO, IT'S NOT YOUR FAULT. THANK YOU. OKAY. I THINK WE'RE READY TO VOTE.
CHERYL. COUNCIL MEMBER, FOWLER. YES. THERE ARE NINE YES, FOLKS, SO THIS WILL GO TO A BUSINESS THAT OUR NEXT COUNCIL MEETING MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER FIVE, WHICH IS AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO THE ZONING OF PROPERTY. LOCATED AT 5 41 EAST ARMS BE AVENUE CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.77 ACRES AND BEING A LITTLE METRO CASE NUMBER 23 ZONE, 0057.
MOTION. PROBABLY MOVED A SECOND . WE'RE READY FOR DISCUSSION. THIS IS PLAYING COMMISSION DOCTOR NUMBER 23 ZONE 57 FOR 5 41 EAST ORMSBY AVENUE. THAT IS. THE ADDRESS IS LOCATED. METRO COUNCIL DISTRICT SIX. THIS IS A AERIAL PHOTO OF THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING STRUCTURES
[01:00:06]
EXIST THERE AT THE CORNER EAST ARMS IN SOUTH HANCOCK. THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING A MIXED COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING , WHICH IS THE CURRENT USE RIGHT NOW ON THE SITE. UM THIS IS THE ZONING MAP OF THE AREA. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED R SIX IS A NUMBER OF PROPERTIES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA DEFINITELY IS PROPOSING TO CHANGE AS GOING TO SEE TO COMMERCIAL SO THE REQUEST BEFORE WE USE THE CHANGE FROM OUR SIX MULTI FAMILY TO SEE TO COMMERCIAL PROPOSING TO RENOVATE THE EXISTING SITE FOR MIXED COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL IT IS A HISTORICALLY MAKES YOU STRUCTURE AS YOU'LL SEE IN THE PICTURES THAT ARE COMING FORWARD HERE IN THE PRESENTATION SHORTLY , AND THEN THE C TWO PROPOSED FOR GREATER DENSITY ALLOWANCE, WHICH I CAN TALK ABOUT THAT WHEN I BRING UP THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. GOTTA TAKE THOSE OUT THE THIS IS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. SO THE SO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE THERE AT THE CORNER THAT WOULD REMAIN AND WOULD BE RENOVATED. UH, TYPICALLY OR THE APPLICANT SAID. IDEALLY THEY WOULD HAVE LIKE SOME SORT OF OFFICE OR COMMERCIAL ON THE FIRST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL ON THE SECOND FLOOR IF THE COMMERCIAL SPACE WAS DONE WAS NOT NEEDED FOR THE ENTIRE FIRST FLOOR, SO THEY WOULD POSSIBLY LOOK AT DOING SOME ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON THAT FIRST FLOOR, WHICH IS ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THEY REQUESTED THE C TWO AND C ONE.THE EXISTING GARAGE WOULD BE REPLACED WITH A NEW ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, WHICH THEY SHOW IN THE RENDERINGS. UM SO THIS IS ONE OF THE RENDERINGS THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT OF THE PROPOSED PRIMARY STRUCTURE AND THEN THE NEW ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, WHICH WILL BE LOCATED IN THE REAR OF THE ALLEY. THIS IS A PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SO AGAIN, YOU CAN KIND OF SEE HOW HISTORICALLY THIS WOULD BE VIEWED AS LIKE COMMERCIAL AND FIRST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL ON SECOND. THIS IS THE SIDE PICTURE FROM SOUTH HANCOCK. YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING GARAGE HERE. BUT AGAIN THAT THIS PROPOSAL BE REMOVED. THIS IS THE ADJACENT SITE. ANOTHER PICTURE OF SOME OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES THAT ARE ON THE STREET. AND MORE ADJACENT PROPERTY PICTURES. THE APPLICANT CONDUCTED THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ON NOVEMBER 30TH 2022 AND DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE ME WAS ON JULY 27 2023 IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS ON AUGUST 31ST 2023. THE EMOTION WAS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. THE CHANGING ZONING FROM OUR SIX TO SEE TO THAT PASSED BY A VOTE OF 8 TO 0. THAT'S ALL THAT HAPPENED SHOULD BE QUESTIONS FOR ME.
COUNCILWOMAN RUI. YES THANK YOU . I WAS JUST LOOKING AT THE DRAWINGS AND NON WONDER. IS THIS LOT GOING TO BE COMPLETELY BUILT UP? THAT'S WHERE I WAS LOOKING AT THE DRAWINGS. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S NOT MUCH LEFT FOR. ACCEPTING RAINWATER DRAINAGE, ANYTHING LIKE THAT THERE WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT OF SPACE BETWEEN THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE PROPOSAL CENTURY STRUCTURE, BUT I MEAN, IT'S NOT THERE'S NOTHING LARGE AND THERE ISN'T ANY KIND OF DETENTION REQUIREMENTS ON THE SITE BECAUSE IT'S SO SMALL, SO MHM YEAH, I'M JUST JUST CONCERNED. IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THERE. THERE'S NOTHING LEFT IS COMPLETELY FILLED IN. OKAY. THANK YOU. THIS ISN'T COUNCILMAN BAKER'S DISTRICT COUNCILMAN BAKER. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. UM I THINK THIS PROPOSED WOULD BE GREAT FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, SPOKE WITH SEVERAL RESIDENTS IN THE AREA AND THERE WAS NO OPPOSITION. THERE WAS ALSO NO OPERATOR POSITION AND PLAYING HIS OWNING AND THEN THEY HAVE BINDING ELSEWHERE. THIS WILL NOT BECOME A LIQUOR STORE. HOWEVER IT WILL BE A RESTAURANT, SO I'M ALL IN FAVOR FOR THIS. AND YOU HAVE MY I ENCOURAGE YOUR YES. VOTE ON THIS PROJECT. THANK YOU.
BECAUSE THERE WERE SEVERAL CATEGORIES SEVERAL THINGS WITHIN THE C ONE CATEGORY AND SEE TWO CATEGORIES THAT WERE BINDING DOWN AND I LIKE THE IDEA THAT THERE WAS ALSO, UM, TIME LIMITS . UM FOR LIQUOR BY THE DRINK AND FOR OUTDOOR ENTERTAINMENT IN THE AREA, SO THAT WAS VERY THOUGHTFUL. ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? SEEN THEM ALREADY TO VOTE BOGANS OPEN.
CLOSED WITHOUT OBJECTION ON HIS CLOSED AND THIS IS PASSES 8 TO 0, AND IT WILL GO TO A BUSINESS THAT OUR NEXT COUNCIL MEETING MOVING ON TO THE NEXT ITEM, WHICH IS BEING HELD THAT'S IN COUNCILMAN BLACKWELLS DISTRICT FROM MOVING TO ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, WHICH IS AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 60 TO 12 AND 60 TO 20 SHEPHERDSVILLE ROAD, 5700, JANEY'S WAY AND PARCEL NUMBER. PART PARCEL ID NUMBER 6340. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 2.54
[01:05:12]
ACRES AND BEING A LITTLE METRO CASE NUMBER 22 ZONES 0096. PROBABLY MAYBE A SECOND. WE'RE READY FOR DISCUSSION. THIS IS PLAYING COMMISSION DOCTOR NUMBER 22 ZONE 96 FOR SHEPHERDSVILLE, RODNEY WAREHOUSES, PROPERTIES IN QUESTION 60 TO 12 AND 60 TO 20 SHEPHERDSVILLE ROAD, 5700 JD'S WAY AND THEN THE ONE UNADDRESSED PROPERTY IS LOCATED. METRO COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO UH, THE PROPERTIES CURRENTLY A MIX OF COMMERCIAL AND VACANT SPACE IS PROPOSING THE COMMERCIAL SLASH INDUSTRIALS AND SEEMS A HYBRID DISTRICT. UM SO THIS IS THE ZONING MAP OF THE AREA. AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU HAVE A MIX OF COMMERCIAL AND CM, AS WELL AS SOME MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY STILL IN THE AREA. AH THE THIS PARTICULAR SITE HAS R FOUR C ONE AND C. M ON IT CURRENTLY IS PROPOSING TO MAKE IT ALL C M. SO THE REQUEST AGAINST THE CHANGE THE PROPERTY FROM OUR FOUR AND C 12 CM COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING. THE SITES PARTIALLY VACANT, SORRY IMPARTIALLY DEVELOPED WITH THE NEW TACO BELL RESTAURANT AT THE PROPOSAL TO IS TO REZONE THE SITE IN ORDER TO YOU AS THE REAR PORTION FOR MANY WAREHOUSES, THERE WILL BE PRETTY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO SHEPHERD SHEPHERDSVILLE ROAD THROUGH THE TACO BELL LOCATION. THIS IS THIS IS A PART OF OUR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN APPROVED FOR THE TACO BELL RESTAURANT. THIS WAS 22 D. P 51 , SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THE AREA IN THE FRONT WAS DEVELOPED FOR THE RESTAURANT. ATTRACT, TOO IS VACANT. AND THEN THERE WAS PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN AT THE REAR. SO WITH THIS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE REZONING. SO YOU HAVE THE RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT UP FRONT . AND THEN THE APPLE IS PROPOSING TO PUT IN THE MULTISTORY MEANING WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS BEHIND. THE RESTAURANT AND THEN THE EXISTING DETENTION BASIN WOULD REMAIN. AT THE REAR. THESE ARE SOME SUBJECTS. PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT SITE REPORTED.IT'S VACANT. THESE ARE SOME OF THE ADJACENT SITES. MORE ADJACENT SITES. AND THEN THE APPLICANT PROVIDED THESE PICTURES. THEY'RE THEY'RE NOT EXACTLY WHAT THE BUILDING WOULD LOOK LIKE WHAT THEY ARE WHAT THEY INTEND TO HOW THEY INTEND TO DESIGN THE BUILDINGS THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING. SO THEY PUT THESE KIND OF EXAMPLE PHOTOS. UM THE APPLICANT CONDUCTED THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ON JUNE 29TH 2022. THIS ONE HAD GONE TO L D AND T. BACK IN JANUARY. THEY REVISED THE PLAN, MADE SOME CHANGES AND CAME BACK ON JULY 27 2023. THE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING WAS ON AUGUST 31ST 2023 IN THE MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF CHANGES GOING FROM R FOUR C ONE AND C. M TWO CM PASSED BY A VOTE OF 8 TO 0. THAT'S ALL THAT I HAVE ACTUALLY QUESTIONS FOR ME. THIS IS A COUNCILWOMAN, DOCTOR SHANKLIN DISTRICT FOR SURE. THIS TIME. CANCEL IN. SHANKLIN DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING? UM AND I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT BINDING ELEMENT TO THIS CASE ON YOURS IF THAT'S OKAY WITH YOU. OKAY, THAT'S FINE. OKAY, GO AHEAD. GO AHEAD, DOCTOR SHANKLIN. AH WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY OPPOSITION ON KEEP IN THE AREA WAS SAID THEY WOULD NOT HAVE ANY COMMERCIAL, AND THEY LIKE THE IDEA THAT THEY WERE GETTING THE TACO BELL RIGHT THERE AND BAD. UM MCDONALD'S BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, G EACH LIKE THERE, AND SO IS UM, I'M THINKING BUSH. THERE'S SOME FACTORIES IN THIS CLOSE TO GET OPEN. THEY CAN RUN AND GET THEIR DINNER. SO WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY OPPOSITION WHATSOEVER. I'M OKAY WITH HIM LOOKING FOR YEARS, FOLK. OKAY, UM AND. TRAVIS COULD YOU READ THAT STANDARD BUYING THEM AND I'LL GIVE YOU THE NUMBER HERE, AND I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE I BINDING ON THE NUMBER SEVEN, AND THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO PARSE THAT REAL QUICK. THERE'S BOTH GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC BINDING ELEMENTS HERE. RIGHT. THIS ONE HAD A NUMBER OF LAYERS OF BINDING ELEMENTS, SO IT MIGHT BE AN 11.
I THINK THEY CHANGED THE TRACK NUMBER DESIGNATIONS BETWEEN THE FIRST CASE AND SECOND CASE, THE MINI WAREHOUSE. TRACTORS TRACKED ONE SECRET, BRIAN YES. YES, THE MANY WAREHOUSES TRACKED ONE TACO BELL'S TRACK, TOO. OKAY? BETTER RESIDUAL TRACKED. RIGHT? SO WE NEED TO ADD THAT TO BOTH. TRACK SING. YEAH I THINK THE CLEANEST WAY TO ADD IT IS ON TRACKED ONE TRACK TWO IS ALREADY. ALREADY
[01:10:07]
EXISTING AND DEVELOPING, I'M TRIP. TECHNICALLY, PART OF THE APPLICATION HAVE BEEN TO THE EXTENT THAT IT'S GOT THE SAME GENERAL PLAN. UM TRACK ONE IS REALLY WHAT'S BEING CHANGED HERE . SO I THINK THAT PROPOSED BY THE ANSWER TRACTOR ONE IS THE MOST APPROPRIATE SPOT TO HOW IT'S THIS. UM SO THAT WOULD BE. BY NOON ON THAT NUMBER. 11 THEN YES, OKAY. GO AHEAD, UM, ANY SIGNIFICANT INCREASES TO THE PRO STRUCTURES E G INCREASES IN BUILDING HEIGHT NUMBER UNITS, NUMBER OF BUILDINGS AND INCREASE IN DENSITY ON THE PROPERTY, AND HE CHANGED THE USE OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR SUBCOMMITTEE THEREOF, AND OR ANY AMENDMENT TO THE BONE ELEMENTS OTHER THAN I, THE ADDITION OF NEW MONEY ELEMENTS TO I CHANGED THE MINING ALL MIX THAT MERELY UPDATE THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE OR THREE. I UPDATING A PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS BINDING ELEMENT TO REFLECT THE CURRENT LANGUAGE. SHALL BE REVIEWED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WITH FINAL ACTION TO BE DETERMINED BY METRO COUNCIL. I MOVE THAT AMENDMENT. PROBABLY MOVED A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT BINDING ELEMENT SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE, AYE, AYE. I WAS OPPOSED BY LIKE SCIENCE. SEEN ON THE MOTION CARRIES, UM COUNCILWOMAN RUI. ARE YOU? OKAY? YES THANK YOU VERY MUCH AS TAKING NOTES ON, UM SO THIS ONE HAS BLUE SPRING DITCH ON THE FAR EDGE OF IT. AND HOW DOES THIS DEVELOPMENT IS? HOW IS THAT GOING TO BE AFFECTED AS IT LOOKS RIGHT NOW? IT LOOKS LIKE THEY'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING IN THAT AREA . IS THAT MARKED OFF IN SOME WAY TO ENSURE THAT THEY DON'T DO ANYTHING IN THERE. HOW'S THAT WORK? SO IT IS A BLUE LINE STREAM. UM EVEN THOUGH IT'S NEITHER DITCH AND SO THEY DO HAVE THE. SORRY. THE TRY THAT YEAR. SO THERE IS THE DETENTION BASED ON THE BACK. BUT THEN ALSO YOU DO HAVE THE STREAM SIDE OF THE MIDDLE ZONE AND OUTER ZONE THAT EXTENDS FROM THE TOP OF BANK OF THIS OF THAT, AND SO, UM, THERE. THERE WAS A. UH YOU KNOW THAT THEY HAD TO GET APPROVAL TO HAVE THAT DETENTION BASIN BACK THERE THE FIRST TIME, BUT YOU KNOW, NO ADDITIONAL, UM , DEVELOPMENTS BEING PROPOSED IN THAT YOU CAN EVEN SEE HOW THEY KIND OF STAGGERED THAT THAT EDGE OF THE OF THE NORTHERNMOST BUILDING THERE IN ORDER TO STAY OUT OF THOSE BUFFER ZONES. AND SO YOU HAVE YOU HAVE THE CHAPTER FOUR WATERWAY PROTECTION BUFFERS THERE IN PLACE TO KEEP ANYTHING FROM FROM GOING INTO THOSE AREAS. OKAY THANK YOU THAT AREAS HISTORICALLY A SWAMP AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE IT STAYS WELL DRAINED OR PEOPLE ARE DEFINITELY NOT GOING TO BE USING IT. YES, THANK YOU. DOCTOR SHANNON. DID HE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD BEFORE WE DO A VOTE? NO, I'M OKAY. OKAY. UM, WE'RE READY TO VOTE. IT'S OPEN. I WON'T.SHANKLIN. YES. WITHOUT OBJECTION, VOTING IS CLOSING. THERE ARE EIGHT YES VOTES, AND THIS WILL GO TO OLD BUSINESS AT OUR NEXT MEETING. COUNCIL MEETING. I DON'T REMEMBER EIGHT IS NOT TO BE CAUGHT TODAY. I DON'T REMEMBER NINE AND 10 ARE BEING 10, 11 AND 12 ARE BEING HELD ITEM NUMBER 13 IS AN THIS WAS TABLED AT THE LAST MEETINGS THAT WAS HEARD AT ON AUGUST THE 15TH AND HELD AT THE 29TH MEETING, SO IT'S AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CLOSURE OF A PORTION OF THE RIGHT AWAY OF FAGAN, WHICH LAND ADJACENT TO 59 05. BEGGING BUSH LAND CONTAINING A 3.87 ACRES AND BEING ALL OVER METRO CASE NUMBER 23 STREET CLOSURE 0017. PROBABLY MOVED AND SECONDED TIMETABLE. WE'RE READY FOR DISCUSSION. AND I BELIEVE. SO I THINK THAT THE CHIEF REASON THAT THIS WAS TABLED LAST TIME WAS TO DISCUSS WITH COUNCILMAN SHANKLIN. UM I HAVE HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS WITH HER ON THE PROJECT, WHICH IS ALSO ONLINE. SO IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO A COUNSELOR, WHEN YOU'RE WELCOME TO OTHERWISE I CAN SUMMARIZE WHAT YOU SAID TO ME WHATEVER YOU LIKE TO DO. YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND SPEAK ON HIM. UM, SO IN SHORT, COUNCILMAN JENKINS CHIEF CONCERN WITH THIS PROPERTY SORT OF WHAT GOES HERE. EVENTUALLY SHE ASKED WHETHER OR NOT THE STANDARD BINDING ELEMENT MIGHT BE ATTACHED. UNFORTUNATELY ROAD CLOSURES DON'T COME WITH A SORT OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN OR THERE'S JUST NO WAY FOR US TO ATTACH A MINING ELEMENT TO ANYTHING THAT KEEPS THAT'S KEPT TRACK OF HERE. UM THAT BEING SAID. I THINK WE CAN VERY CLEARLY STATE NOW FOR STAFF FOR THE APPLICANT FOR EVERYBODY THAT COUNCILS INTERESTED IN THIS PROPERTY AND THAT IN ALL LIKELIHOOD, WHEN AND IF IT IS DEVELOPED COUNTER MAY USE 11 75 TO BRING IT UP IN FRONT OF THE COUNCIL AT THAT TIME TO REVIEW AND THEN PROBABLY THAT TIME ATTACHED TO STANDARD
[01:15:04]
BINDING ELEMENT TO KEEP AN EYE ON IT GOING FORWARD. I MEAN IT. IT COMBINED WITH THE LOT THAT IT WOULD BE SORT OF ABSORBED INTO IS A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF SPACE. UM AND I THINK IT'S CURRENTLY ZONE C TWO. SO YOU KNOW A LOT OF DIFFERENT SORT. SORTS OF RETAIL MIGHT GO IN THERE. UM AND SO I THINK THAT WAS WHERE THE CHIEF CONCERNS. UM, THAT WERE EXPRESSED IN SORT OF THAT'S UNFORTUNATELY AGAIN WE CAN'T DEAL WITH IT WITH A BINDING ELEMENT OR CONDITION OF APPROVAL OR ANYTHING HERE, BUT IT'S SOMETHING WE CAN KEEP AN EYE ON FOR WHEN IT DOES DEVELOP.UM OTHERWISE, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AGAIN. WE'VE SEEN THIS ONE A COUPLE OF TIMES . IT'S BEEN FRUSTRATING TO COUNSEL. UH FOR SOME REASONS, THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A SORT OF MARKET PLAN OF WHAT IT MIGHT LOOK LIKE. UM BUT ULTIMATELY WE DON'T HAVE A GOOD WAY TO. WE CAN'T CAPITALIZE ON THIS PROPERTY. WE CAN'T SELL IT. WE CAN'T DEVELOP THAT AS METRICAL ONCE IT IS NO LONGER RIGHT OF WAY TO FAULTS. TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. BY FUNCTION OF STATUTE, SO OUR HANDS ARE A LITTLE BIT TIED WITH WITH OUR OPTIONS HERE. UM, BUT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ON THAT FRONT. TO SEE WHAT YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT WE VOTED ON WHAT MADONNA AND THEN BACK TOWARDS HIM, SO I'M OKAY. WITH WHAT? LET'S SEE IT AND WILLING TO JUST GO ON AND GET RID OF IT . THAT'S A GOOD WAY TO PUT IT OUT. I UNDERSTAND EXACTLY YOUR FRUSTRATION WITH THIS WEEK.
WE'VE DEALT WITH US A COUPLE OF TIMES. THIS IS THIRD TIME'S A CHARM. I GUESS. 10, RIGHT? THANK YOU. SAYING NO ONE ELSE IN TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. I THINK WE'RE READY FOR A VOTE.
WITHOUT OBJECTION, VOTING HIS CLOSING THEIR EIGHT YES. VOTES IN THIS WILL GO TO, UM, UM CONNECT, GO TO OH, BUSINESS, OR DOES OBERST CONSENT. I MEANT ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT COUNCILMAN DOCTOR SHANKLIN TO GO TO CONSENT. YES I THINK WE'VE DISCUSSED IT ENOUGH TO SELL IT.
OKAY THANK YOU TOTALLY AGREED. THIS WILL GO TO CONSENT CALENDAR THAT OUR NEXT MEETING SO THAT ONE MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 14 WHICH WILL BE OUR LAST ORDER OF BUSINESS, WHICH IS AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CLOSURE OF A 40 FT ALLEY BETWEEN PRESTON HIGHWAY AND CAROL AVENUE. CONTAINMENT APPROXIMATELY 2592 SQUARE FEET AND BEING A LITTLE METRO CASE NUMBER 23 STREET CLOSURES 0018.
PROPERLY MOVED IN SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CHAPEL AND COUNCILMAN RUI WE'RE READY FOR DISCUSSION PLAYING COMMISSION. DOCKET NUMBER 23 STREET CLOSURE 18 FOR THE OKLAHOMA CENTER ALLEY CLOSURE. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN DISTRICT 13. UM THIS IS THE OUTLINE OF THE AREA OF RIGHT AWAY TO BE CLOSED THAT THERE WAS PROPOSING TO, UH TO CLOSE AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S LOCATED IN THE NEAR THE NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF PRESIDENT, HIGHWAY AND OUTER LOOP ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT, UM, THIS ONE OF THE SITES IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED AND THE AFRICANS PROPOSING A HAS SUBMITTED A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT'S COMING THIS REQUEST. AND SO YOU'LL SEE THAT PLAYING HERE IN JUST A MOMENT. THIS IS THE AREA AS IT, UH EXIST OVER A ZONING MAP. SO THE APPLES PROPOSING TO CLOSE THIS Y SHAPED 40 FT WIDE ALLEY. THE NORTHERN PORTION IS JUST 20 FT WIDE AND THEN ALL THE ADJACENT LOTS WOULD MAINTAIN ACCESS TO THE RIGHT OF WAY ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. THE CLOSURE IS BEING REQUESTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED OAKLAND CENTER DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS 22 CAT, 3 19. UM THIS IS THE ZOOM IN OF THE STREET CLOSURE PLAN AGAIN TO SHOW THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT THE ATMOS PROPOSING TO CLOSE AND THEN THIS IS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THIS IS THAT CATEGORY THREE PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED BY, UH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS WELL AS THE BORDER ZONE ADJUSTMENT BECAUSE THERE WAS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PARKING LOT RIGHT HERE. AND SO AS YOU CAN SEE THE APPLES, PROPOSING A SERIES OF OUTLAWS TO BE DEVELOPED. UH AND, UM THEY'RE PROPOSING TO CLOSE THE RIGHT OF WAY. UH AND PART OF THE PART OF SOME OF THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUEST IS THAT THE KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET WOULD HAD ASKED THAT THE, UH NORTH THAT THIS INTEREST BE REMOVED AND THAT THE ENTRANCE BE PUSHED AS FAR NORTH AS POSSIBLE ON THIS OUT, LOT ONE AND SO, AS YOU CAN SEE, THEY HAVE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS POINT RIGHT HERE ALONG THIS PROPERTY LINE, AND THEN THIS ONE WILL BE GOING AWAY.
THIS IS A PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY SANDS. THE BILLIONAIRE HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED RIGHT HERE.
[01:20:09]
THIS IS ANOTHER PHOTO LOOKING OVER ON THE CARROLL AVENUE SIDE. I NEVER THOUGHT OF THE SIDE.ANOTHER ONE WITH THE AREA THAT'S BEING CLOSED, HIGHLIGHTED HERE OUTLINED IN RED THE LAND DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETINGS ON JUNE 22ND . AND THEN THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONDUCTED CONDUCTED A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CLOSURE REQUEST ON AUGUST 3RD 2023. THE MOTION WAS TO RECOMMEND APPROVE THE CLOSURE, AND THAT VOTE WAS 4 TO 2. THAT'S ALL THE HANDSHAKE QUESTIONS FOR ME. THIS ISN'T COUNCILMAN UM SAM'S DISTRICT, AND HE IS SUPPORTING THIS. UM ALSO, UM, YOU MAY HAVE HEARD ME OR REMEMBER ME TALKING ABOUT THERE WAS AN ALLEY AND, UH, USED TO BE IN MY DISTRICT, BUT IT'S NOW COUNCILMAN SCIENCE DISTRICT THAT WAS VERY DANGEROUS. WHEN WE CLOSED ONE SIMILAR TO THIS. I THINK IT WAS IN COUNCILMAN COREY AUTHORS DISTRICT AT THAT PICTURE DOES NOT DO IT. JUSTICE FOR HOW BAD THAT THE ALLEYWAY IS. BUT HOW DANGEROUS THAT I'VE ALWAYS THOUGHT IT WAS. I'VE LIVED OUT THERE ALL MY LIFE AND SAYING PEOPLE THAT DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S ALLEY IN THERE, WALKING AND WITH CHILDREN ALONG THAT ALLEY AND THEN A CARGO SPEEDING THROUGH, SO IT'S JUST TO ME IT'S A CLOSURE OF A HORRIBLE ACCIDENT JUST WAITING TO HAPPEN SO I JUST THOUGHT I WOULD ADD MY TWO CENTS IN FOR THAT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? SEEN NO ONE IN THE QUEUE FOR I'M SORRY. IT'S NOT GO AHEAD, COUNCILMAN. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. UM BRIAN, CAN YOU SPEAK ON THE TWO NO VOTES FROM THE COMMISSION. SO THERE WAS, UM YEAH, THE TWO NO VOTES. UM, I KNOW THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CONDITION AND THE WIDTH OF CAROL AVENUE.
UH I DON'T KNOW THEY'RE DEDICATING RIGHT AWAY TO THAT. BUT THERE WAS JUST SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT YOU KNOW, WOULD TRAFFIC STILL BE GOING OVER THAT WAY? WE DID HAVE SOME PEOPLE SPEAK ABOUT THE ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT AND ABOUT THE, UH YOU KNOW, TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE COMING IN AND OUT OF THE A CAROL AVENUE, SO IT PRIMARILY HAD TO DO WITH UH, THE CONDITION OF CAROL AVENUE AND YOU KNOW HOW MUCH ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC MAY OR MAY NOT BE SENT THAT WAY. AND.
WHERE IT'S AT MAKES IT DANGEROUS GOING EVEN OUT ON PRESTON HIGHWAY BECAUSE IT'S CLOSE TO THAT OUTER LOOP PRESTON HIGHWAY INTERSECTION. I THINK WE'RE READY FOR A BOAT, CHERYL.
YES. WOULD YOU RECORD TRANSFER AND I SAID YES. WITHOUT OBJECTION. VOTING IS CLOSING.
THERE WERE EIGHT YES, VOTES, AND THEN WE'LL GO TO, UM, CONSENT CALENDAR AT THE NEXT LADY. THERE IS NOTHING ELSE IN OUR AGENDA SO WITHOUT OBJECTION, WE WILL STAND ADJOURNED TO OUR NEXT COMMITTEE
[Adjournment Note: Agendas are followed at the discretion of the Chair. While an item may be listed, it does not mean all items will be heard and/or acted upon by the Committee.]
MEETING. THANK YOU ALL.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.